Re: [sdcc-devel] Missing snapshots: documentation GNU/Linux on x86, Windows on x86 and amd64

[Philipp K. K. <pk...@sp...>]

Am 02.11.24 um 09:40 schrieb dan...@un...:
> On Fri, 1 Nov 2024, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
>
>>> I think I recall that there was a change so that only the simulators
>>> needed for enabled ports are being built now, so we just need to update
>>> sdcc.nsi to reflect this.
>>
>> But is is the right thing to not ship the XA-51 simulator? We don't have
>> an XA-51 port in SDCC, but someone might still want to use SDCC to
>> create asm for MCS-51, and then run it on an XA-51 simulator?
>
> They can pick up full uCsim installer from uCsim site. It contains lot
> more simulators.

Or, since XA-51 is an extended MCS-51, we could build the simulator for
it whenever the mcs51 port is not disabled?

Philipp