Re: [Sdcc-user] Possible changes to inline assembler syntax

[<al...@et...>]

On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 18:46:46 +0200
Benedikt Freisen <b.f...@gm...> wrote:

> What about an additional pre-processing stage that transforms syntax
> variant 1 to variant 2?


Right now you can use __asm at points where it's not a C statement
boundary, or potentially even in C code. I guess it would depend a lot on
the parser how it coped with stuff like


__asm
         .area _DISCARD
__endasm

void foo(void) {
	blah();
}