From: Maarten B. <sou...@ds...> - 2014-04-02 18:36:33
|
> On 01.04.2014 23:58, Raphael Neider wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Maarten Brock >> <sou...@ds... <mailto:sou...@ds...>> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Raphael, >> >> Thanks. I will try to make RC3 tomorrow from the snapshots. Let's >> hope they work normally. Today I added the dedication to Borut >> which in my shame I forgot to add before. >> >> You explicitly set versions of the tools below. Is that necessary >> or is any newer version ok? I guess that I only need to run the >> first line before I do a commit to get a new configure script. >> >> >> We *need* to use autoconf 2.64, because the included binutils >> require exactly that specific version. I had automake 1.13 (and >> aclocal 1.13) installed on my machine, and they fail because they >> in turn require autoconf >= 2.65 (or was it >= 2.69?), so just >> running autoreconf2.64 did not work for me. automake 1.12 was not >> released (as far I can tell, at least, it's not available in >> Xubuntu by default), so I guess the best we can do is use automake >> 1.11. I think I also tried 1.10, but do not clearly remember :-(. > > I think autoreconf can be run with --no-recursive, just regenerating > the top-level stuff, and leavig the binutils stuff untouched. That > should allow to use a newer version. > > Philipp Sorry, this came too late. I already committed all regenerated files. The goods news is that at least Mac OS X 10.4 seems to have built a complete snapshot of revision 8981. For the others my last commit came too late. So the bad news is that we have to wait another day before I can try to create RC3. Still keeping my fingers crossed ;) Maarten |