From: Maarten B. <sou...@ds...> - 2013-05-07 22:12:01
|
> On 07. 05. 2013 22:11, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: >> On 07.05.2013 22:03, Maarten Brock wrote: >>> Hello again, >>> >>> It seems this bug has already been fixed in GCC 4.7.x where our version >>> is >>> based on 4.7.0. See: >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53285 >>> >>> Borut, >>> >>> Do you have time to have a look at this and make an estimate of the >>> risk >>> involved? It would be nice if SDCC could compile without warnings on >>> GCC >>> 4.7.x. >>> >>> Maarten >> >> Raphael showed that they are really just warnings, nothing serious. IMO >> Merging a new upstream version seems like something big enough to better >> do after the release. >> >> Philipp > > I agree with Philipp. The problem is fixed in the binutils CVS head > which was not officially released yet. I propose to wait for the next > binutils release (probably 2.24) and synchronize sdbinutils with it. > > BTW this is an old problem and it was present in all sdcc versions since > sdbinutils was introduced. > > Borut Ok, agreed. I had not investigated deeper than the mentioned link. And I specifically only asked for a risk assessment. And even that only if time permited. Until now I have only found 2 small issues in the win32 installer: 1) Without meaning any disrespect I think the dedication to Dennis Ritchie can be removed. 2) The link to the online Changelog was not updated to the new location. Furthermore I still intend to update the sdas documentation as I added/modified it quite a lot, but documentation was not yet updated. Anyone else with documentation plans for the release? Maarten |