From: Philipp K. K. <pk...@sp...> - 2012-08-10 12:18:01
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10.08.2012 16:08, Borut Ra?em wrote: > We prefer the GPL+LE license for run-time libraries and header > files, but I think we could also add the BSD-3-Clause licensed > header files to the SDCC distribution since it is GPL compatible > (see > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses). > > I yust don't know where they fit better: should they be in > standard "include" or in "non-free/include" directory? I'd > appreciate the opinion from a debian guru: what is the debian > policy regarding this? > > Borut non-free/include was created for non-free headers. These headers are free, and thus should go into plain include. BSD-3-Clause seems perfect to me, since it gives all the freedoms that GPL+LE gives and is compatible with the latter. Philipp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlAk++YACgkQbtUV+xsoLpptKgCgjv3+WcKB+Jy8fhn4k8YKFfer QooAmwccdGcGonRPHjZvDBNTD6sQxxw7 =nAWJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |