From: Philipp K. K. <pk...@sp...> - 2011-01-18 22:29:54
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 18.01.2011 22:26, schrieb Borut Razem: > On 01/18/2011 07:03 PM, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: >> With the new register allocator regression test failures are down to 5 >> for the gbz80 port. IMO we should consider treating gbz80 as a "full" >> port again once the new register allocator has been merged and those 5 >> failures have been fixed (or just disabled for gbz80), even if there is >> no maintainer. > > This is good news. It seems that we have the gbz80 maintainer, after all > ;-) > >> We'd include it in the daily regression tests and try not to break >> anything that works on gbz80. > > Do you mean to include it before fixing 5 bugs? Yes. > This would mean they > should be disabled and there is a risk that they will be forgotten. I'd open a bug report for them. > OTOH > nobody knows when 5 bugs will be fixed, so there is probability that > gbz80 regtests won't be included for a long time... Which would result in new bugs being introduced into the gbz80 port without being noticed. > > P.S.: Few days ago when I was fixing the ucz80 bug I realized that > implementing gbz80 simulator in ucsim shouldn't be a big problem. But I > don't know if there is any interest for it from users, so I'm not sure > if it is worth to spend the time on it... AFAIK the users of the gbz80 port are few. IMO they are likely to be using other emulators for their work. Philipp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk02FFsACgkQbtUV+xsoLpoGogCg9H80bCgQs6gmvbYkjX2eUWGU XV0AoNTtZlXMPfSjXb4NEarBfPI6/q2A =5wXD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |