Re: [sdcc-devel] Removing something from manual section 8.2

[Maarten B. <sou...@ds...>]

Hi,

I suggest we keep the part about reentrancy but qualify  
which ports it concerns.

I agree that the 2.7.0 enahncements should no longer be 
considered alpha quality.

But there are still some C99 enhacements that are not 
supported [e.g. "for (int i=0;;)"]

Maarten

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Section 8.2 ANSI-Compliance  currently states among others the following
> two points:
> 
> "functions are not reentrant unless explicitly declared as such or the
> - --stack-auto command line option is specified."
> 
> I suggest to remove it, since it is port-specific.
> 
> "# Most enhancements in C99 are not supported, [...] But some have been
> added recently in SDCC 2.7.0. They must be considered alpha quality
> however. [...]"
> 
> I suggest to remove the second part. We've had restrict, inline
> functions, etc for quite some time now, lots of bugs have been removed.
> They should no longer be considered alpha quality.
> 
> Philipp
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAkyT528ACgkQbtUV+xsoLpqufACeNvdNKkIEtJWQkOqB7skeLpv2
> Y7QAnRShXEz8ANFNV7+pc6l02VYdBu9H
> =R+DD
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
> and start using them to simplify application deployment and
> accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> sdcc-devel mailing list
> sdc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-devel
>