Re: [sdcc-devel] The avr port - remove it?

[Michael H. <mic...@ju...>]

I never finished the itz port - that was back when I had a NeoGeo
Pocket with the Toshiba 16 bit version of the Z80 and was interested
in the i186 as well.  The Z80, Toshiba, and i186 are all
architecturally similar so I thought I could do a combined port.

I say delete it.

-- Michael

2009/9/28 Philipp Klaus Krause <pk...@sp...>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Maarten Brock schrieb:
>> I'm ok with that. And while we're at it we could also
>> question those other unmaintained remnants: izt and
>> xa51. Esp. izt (intel 186) is very odd for SDCC and
>> supported by other compilers (e.g. OpenWatcom).
>
> Do these ports still fullfill a purpose, i.e. are in some way better
> than other compilers out there? Are there free compilers for xa51 and
> i186? OpenWatcom is of dubious freeness: Debian does not consider it
> free. There are some strange things in the license.
>
> Philipp
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkq/bCEACgkQbtUV+xsoLpqLXgCfXJmpPs+fHEvGCQBkH4Z+JWZx
> QWMAnR2L7TbjyeMkBj6e12Hn+9a0FxZ/
> =/qW3
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
> _______________________________________________
> sdcc-devel mailing list
> sdc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-devel
>