From: Dave M. <mc...@ne...> - 2008-09-04 21:45:02
|
My point is that RTLs are "compiler internals", and some compilers don't use them at all. High-level language translators (what f2c is) simply translate one language into another...they are not compilers per se. -Dave On Sep 4, 2008, at 4:42 PM, Andrey Vlassov wrote: > Dave, > > it was a time when p2c/f2c was only an option for gcc > > http://directory.fsf.org/project/p2c/ > http://www.netlib.org/f2c/f2c.1 > > Andrey > > > Dave McGuire wrote: > >> On Sep 4, 2008, at 4:03 PM, Andrey Vlassov wrote: >> >> >>> Well, I am not completely sure and it might be that you right >>> that "C" >>> is not "RTL" any more as it was years ago. >>> >>> >> >> "C" was never "RTL". C has always been C. Various RTLs have come >> and gone as needed, typically as intermediary steps in compilation. >> >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win > great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in > the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Sdcc-user mailing list > Sdc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user -- Dave McGuire Port Charlotte, FL |