From: Borut R. <bor...@si...> - 2007-05-07 21:48:47
|
Maarten Brock wrote: > Borut, > > I don't really care about the regex for the tests. I know that my observation was not related to the original problem, but more an answer to Frieder's finding of tests which were not executed. I also saw that you used a function name test() in bug1714204.c, which would be probably better to rename to something else (something not starting with 'test'), to avoid potential problems if the regex will change in the future... > But I > do like to get an answer from someone if the test is > supposed to pass or fail (w/o the L). After that > adaptation is easy. Maybe I should have asked for it > more explicitly. > > My opinion is that L is required in combination of at least one of numbers in the denominator in order to promote the denominator result to long. But I might be wrong... BTW, what is your opinion about the following one? >>This one is still be open "[ 1618050 ] badly optimized xdata pointer" >> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1618050&group_id=599&atid=100599 Borut |