[sdcc-devel] Naming of TYPE_WORD and others

[Bernhard H. <sdc...@be...>]

Hi,

meanwhile I'm very unhappy about the naming of TYPE_WORD, TYPE_UWORD, 
TYPE_DWORD and TYPE_UDWORD, although they've been introduced by me.

These are the standard names of 'configure', but this naming does not at all 
describe the purpose within SDCC. This might be the reason why nobody but me 
uses these types :-(

I propose to rename them to:
TYPE_TARGET_INT
TYPE_TARGET_UINT
TYPE_TARGET_LONG
TYPE_TARGET_ULONG

Comments? Objections? Better proposals?

Bernhard