From: Vangelis R. <vr...@ot...> - 2004-01-04 10:55:26
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "SourceForge.net" <no...@so...> To: <no...@so...> Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 4:49 AM Subject: [sdcc-devel] [ sdcc-Bugs-869095 ] pic16 _CONFIG addresses causes segfault > Bugs item #869095, was opened at 2004-01-01 23:15 > Message generated for change (Comment added) made by albertdh > You can respond by visiting: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100599&aid=869095&group_id =599 > > Category: pic target > Group: None > Status: Closed > Resolution: None > Priority: 5 > Submitted By: Albert den Haan (albertdh) > Assigned to: Vangelis Rokas (vrokas) > Summary: pic16 _CONFIG addresses causes segfault > > Initial Comment: > {a fix patch that worked for me is included below} > .... > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >Comment By: Albert den Haan (albertdh) > Date: 2004-01-02 21:49 > > Message: > Logged In: YES > user_id=117442 > > I'm glad the patch looked sane. > > I'll be looking deeper into the problem RSN. I wonder if > the preceeding noPath check is the one I should have > really used. > > The semantics of the eBBlock fields are a bit of a > mystery :) Like to many of us!:-) Your patch surely seems like an adhoc, but its better to fix it temporarly and place a FIXME bookmark there, than leaving it until you already know every detail. This may take too long, and until then noone will use the port! Vangelis |