From: Goeller <ly...@kl...> - 2009-08-25 17:22:15
|
Ame any plant in the world from seeing only a single leaf! But her college was not Harvard, and Professor Gray has probably never so much as heard of such an admirable method. On the whole, it is good to have the curiosity piqued with here and there a vegetable stranger,--its name and even its family relationship a mystery. The leaf is nothing extraordinary, perhaps, yet who knows but that the bloom may be of the rarest beauty? Or the leaf is of a gracious shape and texture, but how shall we tell whether the flower will correspond with it? No; we must do with them as with chance acquaintances of our own kind. The man looks every inch a gentleman; his face alone seems a sufficient guaranty of good-breeding and intelligence; but none the less,--and not forgetting that charity thinketh no evil,--we shall do well to wait till we have heard him talk and seen how he will behave, before we put a final label upon him. Wait for the blossom and the fruit (the blossom _is_ the fruit in its first stage); for the old rule is still the true one,--alike in botany and in morals,--"By their fruits ye shall know them." What a world within a world the forest is! Under the trees were the shrubs,--knee-high rock-maples making the ground verdant for acres together, or dwarf thickets of yew, now bearing green acorn-like berries; while below these was a variegated carpet, oxalis and the flower of Linnaeus, ferns and club-mosses (the glossy _Lycopodium lucidulum_ was especially plentiful), to say nothing of the true mosses and the lichens. Of all these things I should have seen more, no doubt, had not my head been so much of the time in the tree-tops. For yonder were the birds; and how could I be expected to notice what lay at my feet, while I was watching intently |