Re: [Scst-devel] ERRORS: Expected data direction 2 for opcode ATA PASS-THROUGH(16)

[Bart V. A. <bva...@ac...>]

On 11/26/14 11:56, Irwin wrote:
> Windows 7 x64. If it's a SMART command then it's ok to ignore yes? Could
> have been one of the SMART utils that I ran coincidentally during the
> session.

If you don't need the SMART data at the initiator side then I think it 
is safe to ignore these warnings. On the other hand, it's probably not 
that hard to modify get_cdb_info_apt() such that it sets t_length and 
t_dir for SMART commands that communicate a data buffer between 
initiator and target.

Bart.