#15 type/name not documented

[Martin Gasbichler]

The manual does not mention that (define-record name
...) from defrec-package defines a variable type/name
bound to the type of the record.

[Nobody/Anonymous]

Logged In: NO

In fact, the define-record form has lots of new,
exciting features, that need to be documented.
The source code is quite well commented, so
all features are described there.

May I add, parenthetically, that this damned
sourceforge bugtracking system wraps lines
longer than about eight chars. Urgh.

[Olin Shivers]

Logged In: YES
user_id=101304

There's no exported operation you can perform on the
type/name
value, so what's the point of telling people it's there?

[Martin Gasbichler]

Logged In: YES
user_id=17553

You need the name of the type for define-record-discloser
and define-record-resumer.