Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] Porblem with temporary files creation

[John F. <jf...@in...>]

On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 00:09, Dan Mueth wrote:

> 
> For (2), I'd be interested to hear arguments for or against it.  We always
> planned to turn ScrollKeeper into a proper library, but started with
> scripts so that it would be simple and easy for people to use with help
> browsers written in different languages or using different XML libraries.  
> The script approach won't work when ScrollKeeper gets more complex, so the
> scripts would eventually have to be replaced by one or more libraries.
> Right now, I'm starting to wonder if using scripts and temporary files was
> more trouble than it was worth.  Is there a value in keeping the scripts
> and temporary files, or do people think we should turn ScrollKeeper
> strictly into a C library which passes XML trees around?
> 

If we have the hacking resources (do we?) I'd like to see it turned into
a library.

Cheers,
John
-- 
John Fleck
jf...@in... (h) jf...@ab... (w)
http://www.inkstain.net http://www.abqjournal.com

"Sometimes, a diner is all about the mac and cheese." 
  - Zippy the Pinhead