|
From: Benjamin T. <ben...@bu...> - 2002-10-02 08:49:36
|
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: [...] >Although option (2) seems clearly preferable to me, the backwards >compatibility issues means it is probably an 0.5 feature. This means we >may have to go with the "dozens of stupid temporary" files in the >0.3/0.4 timeframe unless somebody can come up with a better idea. > >Anybody have thoughts? > >Malcolm > > > Option (2) seems the cleanest to me too, but I don't know if the guys at Yelp will like it ;-) As a temporary fix, isn't it possible to have only one temporary file by user, suffixed by the login name? /tmp/scrollkeeper-tempfile.<login name> Thus, we will have at most one temporary file by user in /tmp and it removes the problem of file names "shared" with other users (and access problem linked to it). (I hope my suggestion is not completely stupid) Benjamin -- B e n j a m i n T h e r y - BULL/BI&S/GeODE/AIX & Linux CC mailto:Ben...@bu... http://www.bull.com |