Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] Categories for Gnome Applications

[Andrew S. <an...@so...>]

On Sat, 2002-08-24 at 22:55, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> l=F6r 2002-08-24 klockan 21.43 skrev Sander Vesik:
> > On Sat, 24 Aug 2002, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> >=20
> > > On Sat, 24 Aug 2002, Sander Vesik wrote:
> > >=20
> > > > On Sat, 24 Aug 2002, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Can I suggest adding a few more Application categories to the
> > > > > canonical Gnome tree for scrollkeeper?  At present we have...
> > >=20
> > > > > I think we could do with, say, Education(al?), Scientific and
> > > > > Other.  I'm developer of an econometrics (economic statistics)
> > > > > program and I can't find a sensible place for its docs in the
> > > > > current tree.
> > > >
> > > > I think a potential source of confusion here is 'gnome docs' vs
> > > > 'docs for programs running under gnome'. For application there are
> > > > categories for educational and scientific apps
> > > > (ApplicationsEducational & ApplicationsScientific), though neither
> > > > have Economics (or for that matter Linguistics, Sociology, etc)
> > > > subcatoegories.
> > >=20
> > > Ah, I take your point.  Perhaps I should go under Applications, not
> > > Gnome/Applications.  It's a bit lonely in there right now. ;-)
> > >=20
> >=20
> > Yes, unfortunately not many applications have seenthe light yet and
> > started providing documentation that integrates with scrollkeeper yet.
>=20
> Rather noone really knows where they should put there documents. We have
> a GNOME/Applications/* with several categories in. Should stuff be
> placed there or should it be places somewhere else?
>=20
> I'm not really sure what the KDE and GNOME categories are for. Currently
> I special give special treatment to the GNOME category. I kinda agrees
> with Havoc here, that we should not distinct so much between GNOME and
> KDE. _But_ for the desktop it will be a mess if KDE docs and GNOME docs
> got messed up. Ie. if we had a Desktop/Panel, and both KDE and GNOME put
> there panel docs there :)
>=20
> Perhaps we should go over it all and make sure that nothing but the
> "core" is in GNOME/. If we are this discussion should be moved to the
> gnome-doc-list. CC'ing there now.

I would expect only "very-gnome" items to be under GNOME. That's the
panel, nautilus, capplets, applets.

The end user may not care that gedit is developed by the gnome project -
it's a text editor, an app, and should be under Applications in the same
place as kedit, emacs, kate and so on. Same job, same place.

>=20
> Regards,
>   Mikael Hallendal
> >=20
> > > Allin Cottrell.
> > >=20
> >=20
> > 	Sander
> >=20
> > 	This is the place where all
> > 	the junkies go=09
> > 	where time gets fast
> > 	but everything gets slow
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
> > cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
> > https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=3Dsourceforge1&refcode1=3Dvs3390
> > _______________________________________________
> > Scrollkeeper-devel mailing list
> > Scr...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scrollkeeper-devel
> >=20
> --=20
> Mikael Hallendal                mi...@co...
> CodeFactory AB                  http://www.codefactory.se/
> Office: +46 (0)8 587 583 05     Cell: +46 (0)709 718 918
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-doc-list mailing list
> gno...@gn...
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
>=20
--=20
Andrew

"Someone needs to make a 'woops' command that reverts the hard disk to
the state it was in 20 seconds ago."
		-- me