Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] strange DTD changes

[Gregory L. <gle...@li...>]

On Mon, 2002-05-20 at 03:08, Martijn van Beers wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 12:01:20AM -0500, Dan Mueth wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Martijn,
> > 
> > I had a similar reluctance to doing away with the beauty and convention of
> > XML and <person>.  The reason why we are currently recommending the form
> > "lo...@us... (Martijn van Beers)" is because that is what
> > is specified by the OMF spec for <creator>.  To quote the spec:
> 
> Hrm, very strange. According to their DTD
> (http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/metadata/OMF.dtd) you do
> use <person>. Also, their OMF generation CGI also uses the <person>

Yeah, but the DTD doesn't necessarily reflect the spec, nor does the
CGI.  I tried to get this straightened up, but I didn't have much luck. 
I've since stopped trying, I don't have the time to work on it to the
extent that's required.  
	Greg

-- 
Portland, Oregon, USA.
Please don't copy me on replies to the list.