Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] Re: converting omf files

[Chris L. <ch...@wi...>]

On Sun, 2002-05-05 at 17:16, Chris Lyttle wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-05-05 at 14:59, John Fleck wrote:
> > 
> > OK, it looks as though the "writing_scrollkeeper_omf_files.xml in
> > ScrollKeeper cvs is more up-to-date than the version on the web site at
> > the URL above.
> > 
> > The "minimal OMF file" and "complete OMF file" examples in the cvs
> > version of the doc validate, with the exception of the "id" attribute of
> > the "version" tag, which should be "identifier". I'll file a bug, and
> > perhaps when Dan surfaces he can do whatever magic is necessary to get
> > the web site version of the doc updated.
> > 
> 
> Thanks for that John, it looks like your omftransform.xsl works to
> transform from the old format to the new. There is one bug, however, it
> doesn't transfer the following;
> 
>    <rights>
>     <type>
>       GNU FDL
>     </type>
>     <license version="1.1">
>       http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html
>     </license>
>     <holder>
>       Rosanna Yuen
>     </holder>
>    </rights>
> 
> properly to;
> 
> <rights type="GNU FDL" license.version="" holder="Rosanna Yuen"/>
> 
> 
> in other words the license.version info is dropped
> Now to get the build working...
> 
> Chris

John,
I just noticed another bug, the following is not being transformed;

<?xml version="1.0" standalone="no"?>

in the old OMF file is being changed to;

<?xml version="1.0"?>

Chris