|
From: Dan M. <d-...@uc...> - 2002-01-03 03:59:46
|
On 2 Jan 2002, Alexander Kirillov wrote: > Thanks! > BTW, I tried to find it on scrollkeeper.sourceforge.net, and not only I > couldn't find the tree itself but even its existence was hidden deep > inside ScrollKeeper 0.2 Specifications. All other pages (e.g., the top > level page) just referred to 16-element OMF specification from metalab, > which says nothing about the category tree. IMHO, existence of this tree > - and the fact that it should be strictly enforced when writing OMF > files - should be prominently posted on scrollkeeper web page. That is a really good idea. In fact, we really should have a little mini-tutorial on writing OMF files with an example OMF file and explanation of how to use each field, in the context of ScrollKeeper. Part of this would be a list of all the categories. And since you mention it, I guess we should start writing up the 0.4 Specifications pretty soon. The changes from 0.2 are pretty well contained to a list of feature improvements which has been added, although the database file formats have matured somewhat. I'm adding these to my TODO list, which I'll put into CVS after I clean it up somewhat. If anybody is looking for something to do before I get it checked in, feel free to email me or just pick anything which interests you. Dan |