Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] extracted index

[<las...@su...>]

Dan Mueth wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 25 May 2001, Mary Dwyer wrote:
> 
> > Hi
> >
> > >From the stylesheet point of view, if we get the main entry for duplicate index
> > terms correct, the see/seealso references will follow.
> >
> > So, to recap, here's an example of the problem:
> > - there are multiple sections in the document indexed by the term "Panel". These
> > sections have the identifiers idx-a2, idx-a5, idx-a9. There are also a number of
> > see/seealso references to "Panel"
> > - under the current stylesheet structure this would result in the index entry
> >   <primary>
> >     <title linkid="idx-a2" indexid="id10715">Panel</title>
> >     <title linkid="idx-a5" indexid="id10715">Panel</title>
> >     <title linkid="idx-a9" indexid="id10715">Panel</title>
> 
> Right.  I hadn't thought of this until you pointed it out.  This does not
> describe what the index really looks like - it has one Panel item with
> three links, not three items named "Panel" each with one link.  For this
> reason, the id's should be children instead of attributes.
> 
> > - the following solution appealed, but unfortunately ID and IDREFs as element
> > content is illegal :-)
> 
> Why is it illegal?

I think Norman Walsh said to Mary we shouldnt do it like this. Norm, is
this what happened?

Laszlo