Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] Migration to libxml2

[Daniel V. <vei...@re...>]

On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 12:52:53PM -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
> / Daniel Veillard <vei...@re...> was heard to say:
> |   libxml don't read SGML Dtds, this parser is an had-hoc parser. All tags
> | need to be compiled in. Sorry it's gross but developping a full blown
> | SGML parser is not a good use of anybody's time now :-)
> 
> And simply linking to SP isn't an option because...?

  Because I don't know how to do it. If scrollkeeper developers want to do
it, fine by me :-)
  There is no good reason to do it for libxml, the goal of the exercise was
to provide a tool (a hack agreed) to smooth the transition (and provide a
way to save external parsed entities when converting existing docs to XML).
Now if someone has a better solution, fine by me.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
vei...@re...  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/