|
From: Gregory L. <gle...@cu...> - 2001-05-18 16:05:23
|
On 18 May 2001 10:44:54 -0500, Dan Mueth wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 May 2001, László Kovács wrote:
>
> > 1. The SGML parser is not perfect, there are DocBook tags it doesnt know
> > about. This is easy to fix though, I already sent a couple of patches to
> > Daniel and I will send more.
>
> I don't understand this, but I'm probably just being dumb. What sort of
> tags does the SGML parser need to know about? Most tags are defined in
> the DocBook DTD, not in the parser.
I think your confusion comes from calling this a parser. It's not a
fully-fledged SGML parser, just a "hack" to allow us to process out SGML
docs. I'm still a bit torn here, but I think we might want to look at
taking advantage of the code in jade or openjade to do a real SGML to
XML conversion for us, on the fly (since it seems to only take a
fraction of a second for the conversion using sx/osx). I don't know how
unfriendly that would be.
Greg
--
Troll, troll, troll your post
Gently down the feed
Merrily, merrily troll along
A life is what you need...
|