|
From: Dan M. <da...@ea...> - 2001-04-27 19:34:59
|
I am forwarding Norman's email to the OMF list (ldp-meta), as I think this pertains specifically to the OMF specification and OMF DTD, more than to ScrollKeeper directly. Let's try to have this discussion on that list. BTW: Anybody who is actively involved in ScrollKeeper should probably join the OMF mailing list. You can do so here: http://franklin.oit.unc.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=ldp-meta Dan ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: 27 Apr 2001 13:03:27 -0400 From: Norman Walsh <nd...@nw...> To: scr...@li... Subject: [Scrollkeeper-devel] DocBook and OMF [I'm not sure what list this best belongs on. Forward at will.] In looking at OMF and the existing DocBook metadata, I observe that there are some conflicts (title in OMF doesn't have the same content model as the DocBook title element, person uses "firstName/lastName" where DocBook would use "firstname/surname", etc.). So the first question I have is, which is more appealing to the community developing OFM tools: getting OMF support into DocBook by way of elements in a separate namespace or by getting a joint OMF/DocBook TC task force to harmonize things so that the OMF elements would go directly into DocBook? Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <nd...@nw...> | This mortal life is a little thing, http://nwalsh.com/ | lived in a little corner of the earth; | and little, too, is the longest fame to | come--dependent as it is on a | succession of fast-perishing little men | who have no knowledge even of their own | selves, much less of one dead and | gone.--Marcus Aurelius _______________________________________________ Scrollkeeper-devel mailing list Scr...@li... http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scrollkeeper-devel |