Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] Relations with OMF

[Eric B. <e.b...@no...>]

Le Friday 27 April 2001 14:52, Norman Walsh a =E9crit :
> | > Your suggestion of adding tags which have their own namespace insid=
e of
> | > a DocBook document is interesting.  If we did this, would the docum=
ent
> | > still be a valid DocBook document which can be parsed by any standa=
rd
> | > DocBook tool?
>
> No.

Even when providing and declaring the OMF DTD from the document?

> | ... and if yes, will the OMF tags be validated inside of their own DT=
D?
>
> Nope.
>
> | Maybe Norm knows more than us about this, after all he already
> | investigated issues like DocBook + MathML inclusions.
>
> If we build a single DTD that combines DocBook and OMF, then documents
> can be validated against that.

This of course would be great.

But still, in the Duck book, it is said somewhere that some MathML tagged=
=20
data can be included in a DocBook file. It's basically the same problem, =
and=20
as far as I know, the MathML tags haven't been merged with the DocBook DT=
D.=20
What is the point I don't understand?

--=20
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| =C9ric Bischoff                              mailto:e.b...@no... =
|
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+