Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] Re: group part of URN

[Bob S. <bo...@sc...>]

> From: <las...@su...>
> Organization: Sun Microsystems
> 
> > I seem to have missed the introduction of :group: in
> > the URN.  Is that necessary to establishing a document
> > "name" part?  Or is it part of the metadata (in which case
> > shouldn't it be in the OMF metadata elements)?
> 
> Oh, this was me. I just thought that for a large organization we might
> want to have another level between organization and document. Obvious
> values for this are project or package name.

Well, since the URN string as discussed so far is a
fixed-field string, then all URNs would have to have
a group (or a blank group field).  Given the already
large number of fields, I wonder if it is necessary.
Couldn't Sun (the obvious big organization example 8^)
coordinate assigning the documument name part?  Make
the project string part of the name?

I'm not objecting strongly, I just want the URN usage
to be perfectly clear.

bobs