Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] questions, questions

[Ali A. <ali...@au...>]

* Bob Stayton (bo...@sc...) wrote at 02:07 on 02/12/00:
> > From: Dan Mueth <d-...@uc...>
> >
> > [stuff deleted]
> > 
> > As for just supporting GNOME and KDE, this is definitely *not* the
> > intention.  There are many people who do not use GNOME or KDE, and that
> > will always be the case.  I would be happy to see another help browser
> > which is independent of these two desktops and which can utilize
> > scrollkeeper.  If there was a compelling reason to use some format other
> > than XML, then scrollkeeper's API could be extended.
> 
> Thanks for clarifying.  The application for ScrollKeeper I
> have in mind is not using a browser directly, but serving
> doc content with an HTTP server like Apache.  There are
> several ways to use XML on a server (AxKit, Cocoon), so
> using the XML Content List will be fine in that context.
> The server can also convert content to HTML if it needs
> to.  That approach can make ScrollKeeper-listed docs
> available to any browser.  

Cocoon looks like an amazing project actually ;) But are there some DocBook
XSL's out there? (for DocBook -> HTML conversion) ?

Regards,
Ali