|
From: Bob S. <bo...@sc...> - 2000-12-01 21:35:21
|
> From: Dan Mueth <d-...@uc...>
>
> [stuff deleted]
>
> As for just supporting GNOME and KDE, this is definitely *not* the
> intention. There are many people who do not use GNOME or KDE, and that
> will always be the case. I would be happy to see another help browser
> which is independent of these two desktops and which can utilize
> scrollkeeper. If there was a compelling reason to use some format other
> than XML, then scrollkeeper's API could be extended.
Thanks for clarifying. The application for ScrollKeeper I
have in mind is not using a browser directly, but serving
doc content with an HTTP server like Apache. There are
several ways to use XML on a server (AxKit, Cocoon), so
using the XML Content List will be fine in that context.
The server can also convert content to HTML if it needs
to. That approach can make ScrollKeeper-listed docs
available to any browser.
bobs
Bob Stayton 400 Encinal Street
Publications Architect Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Technical Publications voice: (831) 427-7796
The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc. fax: (831) 429-1887
email: bo...@sc...
|