Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] Category Trees

[Ali A. <ali...@au...>]

* Laszlo Kovacs (las...@su...) wrote at 17:14 on 27/11/00:
> > One other issue which should be discussed for options #1-#3 - What do we
> > do with empty parts of the tree?  Do we show branches that don't have
> > documents in them?  Or are these branches only created as they get
> > populated?   I think the assumption right now is that empty branches
> > exist and are passed to the browser.  (The browser could still potentially
> > snip them out.)
> 
> I don't think this is important from architectural point of view at the
> moment. This is why we chopped the big email to small emails and now we
> are growing it again:-)

I think the "core hackers" (you and Dan) should be more focused to on taking
decisions (even if they are bad ones) rather than having "endless"
discussions. Almost every point brought up has multiple approaches and each
point has pros and cons.

Maybe its just poor communication, but I haven't seen any decisions made (just
discussed to death).

Maybe that'll help the long emails ;)

Regards,
Ali