Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] Handling relocatable packages

[Laszlo K. <las...@su...>]

Nik Clayton wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 02:48:25PM +0000, Laszlo Kovacs wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > There should be no such thing as a non-relocatable package.
> >
> > I guess what we are trying to do is to create support for both
> > relocatable and non-relocatable packages. It is up to the developer and
> > the packager to decide if and how they want to use this support.
> 
> There should be no such thing as a non-relocatable package.
> 
Are you saying that we shouldn't offer the choice I outlined above and
we should force people to build fully relocatable packages (the
documentation part at least) even if they don't want to?

Laszlo