Re: [Scriptonite-dev] Package name
Status: Planning
Brought to you by:
egagnon
|
From: Etienne M. G. <eg...@j-...> - 2000-03-20 18:47:47
|
"Raif S. Naffah" wrote: > > any objection to generating the java code under the package: > > scriptonite > > ? If any of you wants to pay for registering scriptonite.org, we could use "org.scriptonite", and thus conform to the Java convention. Currently, the convention would dictate to use: "net.sourceforge.scriptonite". It is unlikely that anybody will name their project "scriptonite", so one could argue for using package "scriptonite" as you suggest. I personally have no objection to any of these three options. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Etienne M. Gagnon, M.Sc. e-mail: eg...@j-... Author of SableCC: http://www.sable.mcgill.ca/sablecc/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |