From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2009-04-04 06:38:01
|
Bugs item #2730111, was opened at 2009-04-04 14:38 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by lidaobing You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=650539&aid=2730111&group_id=108454 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: IMEngine: Generic Table Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: LI Daobing (lidaobing) Assigned to: James Su (suzhe) Summary: new ZhuYin.txt.in and ZhuYin-Big.txt.in Initial Comment: From: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=449060 although the origin bug is reported against 0.5.7, but the two files does not change since then, so you can still apply the patch. the reporter provide a program (in C++) to reorder the table in 0.5.7 as the same order in 0.5.6, the reorder program and the new ZhuYin.txt.in and ZhuYin-Big.txt.in in attachment. the original bug report as follows: Hi, The character order in ZhuYin and ZhuYin-Big changes from 0.5.6-2 -> 0.5.7-2 makes these two input methods hard to use. For example, if we want to input "結" 0.5.6-2: ru,6 節 ru,6 潔 ru,6 傑 ru,6 捷 ru,6 竭 ru,6 劫 ru,6 截 ru,6 結 ... cut here But in 0.5.7-2, it is: 0.5.7-2: ru,6 㓗 ru,6 㔾 ru,6 㘉 ru,6 㘶 ru,6 㛃 ru,6 㠎 ru,6 㤼 ru,6 㦢 ru,6 㨗 ru,6 㨩 ru,6 㩪 ru,6 㮞 ru,6 㮮 ru,6 㸅 ru,6 㼪 ru,6 䀷 ru,6 䂒 ru,6 䂡 ru,6 䂲 ru,6 䂶 ru,6 䅥 ru,6 䈉 ru,6 䌖 ru,6 䕹 ru,6 䗻 ru,6 䘁 ru,6 䟌 ru,6 䥛 ru,6 䰏 ru,6 䲙 ru,6 倢 ru,6 偈 ru,6 偼 ru,6 傑 ru,6 刦 ru,6 刧 ru,6 刼 ru,6 劫 ru,6 劼 ru,6 卩 ru,6 卪 ru,6 啑 ru,6 婕 ru,6 媫 ru,6 孑 ru,6 尐 ru,6 岊 ru,6 崨 ru,6 嵑 ru,6 嵥 ru,6 嶻 ru,6 巀 ru,6 幯 ru,6 截 ru,6 扻 ru,6 抾 ru,6 拮 ru,6 捷 ru,6 擮 ru,6 擳 ru,6 擷 ru,6 杰 ru,6 栨 ru,6 桀 ru,6 桔 ru,6 桝 ru,6 梜 ru,6 楖 ru,6 楬 ru,6 楶 ru,6 榤 ru,6 櫛 ru,6 櫭 ru,6 渇 ru,6 渴 ru,6 滐 ru,6 潔 ru,6 瀄 ru,6 狤 ru,6 癤 ru,6 睫 ru,6 砝 ru,6 碣 ru,6 礍 ru,6 竭 ru,6 箑 ru,6 節 ru,6 結 ... cut here It seems that the newer version contains more characters than the old one, but it puts the newly-added characters in front of the frequently-used old characters. Is it possible to re-sort the new table according to the old one? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=650539&aid=2730111&group_id=108454 |