From: R. L. <la...@us...> - 2001-11-30 14:37:07
|
Rob Lahaye wrote: > Conrad Steenberg wrote: > > I suggest using cvs branches instead of manually creating branches. That > > way we can let cvs handle merging patches from one branch to another. > > Done! > > I have created a branche "rel-0-8-0". > You get this by replacing the familiar "checkout" (or "co") by > "checkout -r rel-0-8-0" (or "co -r rel-0-8-0"). I'm learning steadily and found out that the tagging of branches was already done in the past, but using a slightly different naming. I therefore renamed the above tag from "rel-0-8-0" into "sg_0_8_0". We now seem to have branched off the following tags: sg_0_8_0 sg_0_7_1 sg_0_6_3 sg_0_6_2 sg_0_6_1 sg_0_6 sg_1_5 sg-0-2 initial_release sg_team I suggest to remove two meaningless and confusing tags: "sg_1_5" and "sg_team". The others are worth keeping. Shall I go ahead with removing these two tags? Regards, Rob. PS: Conrad, Adrian, John could you please check whether your most latest CVS commits have made it into sg_0_8_0. I believe some have been left out, for me not so clear reasons. Otherwise, I think the 0.8.0 release is ready! ...and I have pushed CVS already beyond 0.8.0 :). |