From: Alexander W. <a.w...@ph...> - 2009-11-30 18:57:35
|
Fulvio wrote: Hi! [...] > Yes. > The idea is to not reveal the next move when you reach a position > (sometimes you like to guess it by yourself). Ah. Ic. That's the idea of it. > But when you try to move forward the arrows displays to > warn you that there are multiple variations. Sure. My second "right" is exactly that. >> Secondly, this might be a bit specific for my CC usage. >> Usually I've comments like: >> >> 1. e4 e6 >> (1... e6 2. d4) >> (2... e6 2. d3) >> (2... e6 2. Nf3) >> >> simply cause I've always to add variations at the end of the >> game, implying in Scid that I've to add a variation, redo [...] >> unnecessary. I think this is what confuses me in the first >> place.) >> > That's way i said in a previous post that multiple > variations all starting with the same move are evil :-) No, they're not evil but a necessity. ;) You know, playing CC I've always to add the analysis at the end of the game. No way around having those guys. > However, the only solution that came to me was to have 3D > arrows, so the same moves can be displayed one above the > other. But it's not easy to do... ? I don't understand. What I suggesed was to check if the last ply before the variations is the same ply as within. "if so, do not display the first ply of the var but the second one". However, I do not know if this is at all easy to do. It would be something like showing two plys of variation arrows. -- Kind regards, / War is Peace. | Freedom is Slavery. Alexander Wagner | Ignorance is Strength. | | Theory : G. Orwell, "1984" / In practice: USA, since 2001 |