Re: [Scid-users] (Pascal Georges) Re: 2 feature requested

[andrei r. <rae...@gm...>]

for example when you want to see where your kids or trainees made blunders.
think of it like this: one chess coach with a group of 10 trainees, each
playing 5 games in a day. that's 50 games to look at. do you really want to
have your computer "analyzing" what your trainees' opponents did?

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Gerd Lorscheid <
ger...@on...> wrote:

>                  Hello,
>
>
>
> a chess game is (hopefully a logical flow). It does not help me to
> understand a game, if I check only my moves. I have also to understand where
> my opponent missed chances. So I even do not understand the options to
> analyze a game from one side.
>
> Also it does not save much time, if the engine is allowed to reuse
> evaluations when it switches to the next move.
>
>
>
>                 Gerd
>
>
>
> *Von:* andrei raevsky [mailto:rae...@gm...]
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 15. Oktober 2009 21:26
> *An:* sci...@li...
> *Betreff:* [Scid-users] (Pascal Georges) Re: 2 feature requested
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:13 AM, <sci...@li...>
> wrote:
>
>
> All this seems too specific for me : complex UI for very particular use.
>
> Pascal
>
>
>
> It might be a complex UI to create, but at a time when scholastic chess is
> attracting more and more kids I think that both parents and chess coaches
> would greatly appreciate the ability to have SCID auto-annotate the games
> played by their kids without having to skip over annotations made for their
> opponents.
>
> Andrei
>