Menu
▾
▴
schematics-users — List for users of Schematics software
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(7) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
|
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Noel W. <noe...@ya...> - 2004-11-17 21:33:18
|
Hi all, The latest version of SchemeUnit contains setup and teardown actions for test cases and test suites specified by keyword arguments. E.g.: (make-test-case "name" (assert = 2 (+ 1 1)) setup (display "setup") teardown (display "teardown")) make-test-suite works the same way, except the keywords setup and teardown must be quoted (as make-test-suite is a function, not a macro). I'm not entirely happy with this mechanism and some more work is required (e.g. what happens if a test suite setup or teardown action fails?) so if you have suggestions please send them to me. This is the last task other than documentation for SchemeUnit 2.0. So it should be released soon -- just in time to redevelop it for v300! Noel ===== Email: noelwelsh <at> yahoo <dot> com AIM: noelhwelsh __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http://my.yahoo.com |
|
From: Noel W. <noe...@ya...> - 2004-10-21 11:26:55
|
Hi all, I am considering adding setup and teardown actions to test suites. The cleanest way. to me, of adding these would be to allow keyword arguments to make-test-suite. If I did this I would change make-test-case to also accept keyword arguments for setup and teardown actions, and remove the current system. This would break old code but lead to some improvements IMHO -- one of the most common probs seems to forgetting to wrap multiple expressions in a begin when using make-test-case. Any thoughts? Ta, Noel ===== Email: noelwelsh <at> yahoo <dot> com AIM: noelhwelsh _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com |
|
From: <jen...@so...> - 2004-10-06 20:39:16
|
Noel Welsh wrote: > <>The Schemathics collection has been neglected for a long > time.=20 <>For the math-repl "project", I implemented some more operations from linear algebra on top of the Schemathics matrix library. From <http://www.jasoegaard.dk/doc.txt>: CHANGES (1.0 to 1.01) ---------------------- - "integration.scm" integration now uses Romberg integration - "polynomial-roots.scm" Laguerre's root finding method finds all roots of a polynomial. Usage: (roots list-of-coefs) - "linear-algbra.scm" o row-reduce, row-echelon-form, reduced-row-echelon-form o inverse, linear-solve o basis o (det matrix) now handles arbitrary sizes o identity-matrix, diagonal-matrix, trace o row-space, column-space, rank, nullity o gram-schmidt, ortogonal-basis, orthonormal-basis o qr, lu o jacobi - Supports SISC=20 o Open math-repl/sisc/sisc-start-math-repl.scm in Quack. o Run Scheme o (load "sisc-start-math-repl.scm") The coolest stuff in math-repl is the number theorectic code though. The math-repl wasn't an attempt to make a coherent library, but rather a quick experiment to see, how much one can bend Scheme in order to make the normal Scheme repl suitable for "calculator calculations". See the docs for examples. <http://www.jasoegaard.dk/math-repl.zip> (if you study the function jacobi, promise not to become depressed) --=20 Jens Axel S=F8gaard |
|
From: Aureliano C. <aur...@ya...> - 2004-10-06 18:12:13
|
I've just checked out the pdf referred in your mail and it doesn't include any matrix operations. So I think that I'll stick with schemathics. >>Now I can continue my project of implementing the >>simplex algorithm. I already have implementated matrix >>multiplication (I'm going slow because I'm learning >>scheme, and the algorithm, on my way). How can I >>submit it? I also implemented a coupple of tests using >>SchemeUnit. >> >> > >Sorry about the delay in getting back to you -- it is the >beginning of term and I've been very busy. If you have >patches just email them to me. Alternatively you can >become a Schematics developer and make the changes >yourself. To become a developer send me your Sourceforge >login. > >The Schemathics collection has been neglected for a long >time. The "Science Collection" that has recently been >discussed on the plt-scheme mailing list looks like a very >good replacement. AFAIK the code hasn't been released yet, >but the documentation is online: > > http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/matthias/Tmp/science.pdf > >You might want to check it out if you want to do lots of >numerical computation in PLT Scheme. > >Cheers, >Noel > >===== >Email: noelwelsh <at> yahoo <dot> com >AIM: noelhwelsh > > > |
|
From: Williams, M. D. <M.D...@sa...> - 2004-10-06 16:39:46
|
The science collection is largely complete and I would be happy to send the code to any individuals who want to look it over. It should be ready for general distribution (probably using PLaneT) in the next week or so. Doug > -----Original Message----- > From: sch...@li... [mailto:schematics- > use...@li...] On Behalf Of Noel Welsh > Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 10:29 AM > To: Aureliano Calvo; sch...@li... > Subject: Re: [Schematics-users] matrix.ss modification > > > --- Aureliano Calvo <aur...@ya...> wrote: > > > > Now I can continue my project of implementing the > > simplex algorithm. I already have implementated matrix > > multiplication (I'm going slow because I'm learning > > scheme, and the algorithm, on my way). How can I > > submit it? I also implemented a coupple of tests using > > SchemeUnit. > > Sorry about the delay in getting back to you -- it is the > beginning of term and I've been very busy. If you have > patches just email them to me. Alternatively you can > become a Schematics developer and make the changes > yourself. To become a developer send me your Sourceforge > login. > > The Schemathics collection has been neglected for a long > time. The "Science Collection" that has recently been > discussed on the plt-scheme mailing list looks like a very > good replacement. AFAIK the code hasn't been released yet, > but the documentation is online: > > http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/matthias/Tmp/science.pdf > > You might want to check it out if you want to do lots of > numerical computation in PLT Scheme. > > Cheers, > Noel > > ===== > Email: noelwelsh <at> yahoo <dot> com > AIM: noelhwelsh > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out > more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > Schematics-users mailing list > Sch...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/schematics-users |
|
From: Noel W. <noe...@ya...> - 2004-10-06 16:28:59
|
--- Aureliano Calvo <aur...@ya...> wrote: > Now I can continue my project of implementing the > simplex algorithm. I already have implementated matrix > multiplication (I'm going slow because I'm learning > scheme, and the algorithm, on my way). How can I > submit it? I also implemented a coupple of tests using > SchemeUnit. Sorry about the delay in getting back to you -- it is the beginning of term and I've been very busy. If you have patches just email them to me. Alternatively you can become a Schematics developer and make the changes yourself. To become a developer send me your Sourceforge login. The Schemathics collection has been neglected for a long time. The "Science Collection" that has recently been discussed on the plt-scheme mailing list looks like a very good replacement. AFAIK the code hasn't been released yet, but the documentation is online: http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/matthias/Tmp/science.pdf You might want to check it out if you want to do lots of numerical computation in PLT Scheme. Cheers, Noel ===== Email: noelwelsh <at> yahoo <dot> com AIM: noelhwelsh __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Aureliano C. <aur...@ya...> - 2004-09-29 22:12:34
|
I've looked after the compiled files but I couldn't find them. So I've just reinstalled DrScheme and it worked. Now I can continue my project of implementing the simplex algorithm. I already have implementated matrix multiplication (I'm going slow because I'm learning scheme, and the algorithm, on my way). How can I submit it? I also implemented a coupple of tests using SchemeUnit. > > I want to use the tabulate-matrix function defined > on > > matrix.ss on the subproject schemathics. Because > > tabulate-matrix is a private definition, I've > added it > > to the provide clause. But I'm unable to use it. > > Have you gotten any further with this problem? I > just > modified matrix.ss as you have done so above and it > works > fine for me. > Correo Yahoo! - 6 MB, tecnología antispam ¡gratis! Suscribite ya http://correo.yahoo.com.ar/ |
|
From: Noel W. <noe...@ya...> - 2004-09-29 14:01:33
|
--- Aureliano Calvo <aur...@ya...> wrote: > I want to use the tabulate-matrix function defined on > matrix.ss on the subproject schemathics. Because > tabulate-matrix is a private definition, I've added it > to the provide clause. But I'm unable to use it. Have you gotten any further with this problem? I just modified matrix.ss as you have done so above and it works fine for me. Noel ===== Email: noelwelsh <at> yahoo <dot> com AIM: noelhwelsh __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: <jen...@so...> - 2004-09-27 16:26:22
|
Aureliano Calvo wrote: >I want to use the tabulate-matrix function defined on >matrix.ss on the subproject schemathics. Because >tabulate-matrix is a private definition, I've added it >to the provide clause. But I'm unable to use it. The >error I see (in DrScheme) is "expand: unbound variable >in module in: tabulate-matrix". The previously defined >functions work just fine.=20 > =20 > I am guessing here: Perhaps DrScheme is using the old .zo-file? Search for matrix.zo and delete it, if you find one in a subdirectory of Schemathics. --=20 Jens Axel S=F8gaard |
|
From: Aureliano C. <aur...@ya...> - 2004-09-27 15:28:45
|
Hi! I want to use the tabulate-matrix function defined on matrix.ss on the subproject schemathics. Because tabulate-matrix is a private definition, I've added it to the provide clause. But I'm unable to use it. The error I see (in DrScheme) is "expand: unbound variable in module in: tabulate-matrix". The previously defined functions work just fine. I'm using drScheme version 2.08 under Windows 98 and I've modified the PLTCOLLECTS enviroment variable to point to the modified version of schematics. Thank you very much for your time, Aureliano. Correo Yahoo! - 6 MB, tecnología antispam ¡gratis! Suscribite ya http://correo.yahoo.com.ar/ |
|
From: Noel W. <noe...@ya...> - 2004-08-25 15:39:32
|
Hi all, Does anyone have suggestions for enhancing the text-ui? Its on my TODO list but I can't think of anything useful right now. Thanks, Noel PS: require/expose in util.ss in CVS ===== Email: noelwelsh <at> yahoo <dot> com AIM: noelhwelsh __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Noel W. <noe...@ya...> - 2004-08-18 08:31:27
|
--- Gordon Weakliem <gwe...@od...> wrote: > How would allowing assertions to capture arbitrary > failure info break compatibility with 1.x? ... > Or does it just break custom assertions? You are correct, only custom assertions will be broken. I was just using a lazy shorthand. > I wasn't aware there was a gui, I'll try to have a look > and see what it's about. When you say drop the GUI and > later redevelop it, I'm a little confused by the plan for > the GUI, do you want to drop it or rewrite it? Ryan Culpepper developed the GUI (it is the Test button that appears in DrScheme when you have SchemeUnit installed). It has a much better interface than the text-ui but some problems of its own. This email from him describes the current state of the GUI: http://list.cs.brown.edu/pipermail/plt-scheme/2004-August/006380.html Currently the GUI is broken. I want to make regular releases of new SchemeUnit code and don't have the time to redevelop the GUI right now (and I'm hoping someone else will; either as part of the PLT testing tool or separately :) So I intend to drop it from the 2.0 release and redevelop it if I have time later on. I'm a bit leery to invest a lot of time in it right now as 300 will probably break any work done on 20x Noel ===== Email: noelwelsh <at> yahoo <dot> com AIM: noelhwelsh __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail |
|
From: Gordon W. <gwe...@od...> - 2004-08-18 04:21:46
|
How would allowing assertions to capture arbitrary failure info break compatibility with 1.x? The way I read "break compatibility" means all tests written to 1.x would need to be fixed. Or does it just break custom assertions? require/expose sounds awesome. I wasn't aware there was a gui, I'll try to have a look and see what it's about. When you say drop the GUI and later redevelop it, I'm a little confused by the plan for the GUI, do you want to drop it or rewrite it? -- Gordon Weakliem http://www.eighty-twenty.net -----Original Message from Noel Welsh <noe...@ya...>----- Development on SchemeUnit has been idle for a while and in that time many improvements have been suggested and some bit-rot has set it. I'm resuming development of SchemeUnit and seeking feedback from the user community to guide the next version. My preliminary list of changes is below. It is likely it will take several versions to complete this list and some of the changes with break compatability with the 1.x series. To avoid excessive noise I'm asking everyone who is interested in the future development of SchemeUnit to join schematics-development, if interested in guiding the developing, schematics-users if you merely want to stay abreast of the latest developments. To sign up to either list visit: http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=19879 Thanks, Noel SchemeUnit Proposed Changes: 2.0 [DONE] Allow assertions to record arbitrary information about failure. This has already been implemented in 2.0 alpha 1. Breaks compatability with 1.x Add setup and teardown actions for test-suites. Maybe via keyword arguments. May break compatability with 1.x Drop support for GUI unless someone is willing to help develop it. Release as PlaneT modules in addition to Schematics website Add require/expose macro, aka glassbox testing. (I've lost the source to this, if you have it please send it to me) If possible improve text-ui to display backtraces Miscellaneous additional assertions: - assert-regexp-match - assert-not-false Miscellaneous additional macros: - (make-test-suite* suite-name (case-name case-body) ...) to reduce typing for the common case of (make-test-suite suite-name (make-test-case case-name-0 case-body-0) (make-test-case case-name-1 case-body-1)) 2.1 Port to SISC, Scheme48 and maybe R5RS. 2.2 Implement fold-tds, ala SSAX, for test-suites. This will allow more flexible traversal of test suites, and in turn more flexible reporting options Provide more flexible reporting options: - timing information - log to disk 2.? Additional add-on libraries: - web testing (I have an existing incomplete framework) - WebIt! (ditto) - user contributions Redevelop GUI and/or integrate w/ PLT's tool ===== Email: noelwelsh <at> yahoo <dot> com AIM: noelhwelsh __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Schematics-users mailing list Sch...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/schematics-users |
|
From: Noel W. <noe...@ya...> - 2004-08-17 19:28:58
|
Development on SchemeUnit has been idle for a while and in that time many improvements have been suggested and some bit-rot has set it. I'm resuming development of SchemeUnit and seeking feedback from the user community to guide the next version. My preliminary list of changes is below. It is likely it will take several versions to complete this list and some of the changes with break compatability with the 1.x series. To avoid excessive noise I'm asking everyone who is interested in the future development of SchemeUnit to join schematics-development, if interested in guiding the developing, schematics-users if you merely want to stay abreast of the latest developments. To sign up to either list visit: http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=19879 Thanks, Noel SchemeUnit Proposed Changes: 2.0 [DONE] Allow assertions to record arbitrary information about failure. This has already been implemented in 2.0 alpha 1. Breaks compatability with 1.x Add setup and teardown actions for test-suites. Maybe via keyword arguments. May break compatability with 1.x Drop support for GUI unless someone is willing to help develop it. Release as PlaneT modules in addition to Schematics website Add require/expose macro, aka glassbox testing. (I've lost the source to this, if you have it please send it to me) If possible improve text-ui to display backtraces Miscellaneous additional assertions: - assert-regexp-match - assert-not-false Miscellaneous additional macros: - (make-test-suite* suite-name (case-name case-body) ...) to reduce typing for the common case of (make-test-suite suite-name (make-test-case case-name-0 case-body-0) (make-test-case case-name-1 case-body-1)) 2.1 Port to SISC, Scheme48 and maybe R5RS. 2.2 Implement fold-tds, ala SSAX, for test-suites. This will allow more flexible traversal of test suites, and in turn more flexible reporting options Provide more flexible reporting options: - timing information - log to disk 2.? Additional add-on libraries: - web testing (I have an existing incomplete framework) - WebIt! (ditto) - user contributions Redevelop GUI and/or integrate w/ PLT's tool ===== Email: noelwelsh <at> yahoo <dot> com AIM: noelhwelsh __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Richard C. C. <co...@cc...> - 2004-08-17 16:16:16
|
Lo, on Tuesday, August 17, Noel Welsh did write:
> Add require/expose macro, aka glassbox testing. (I've lost the
> source to this, if you have it please send it to me)
;; Requires a module and exposes some of its unprovided (non-syntax!)
;; identifiers.
;; USAGE: (require/expose MODULE-NAME (IDS ...))
;; where MODULE-NAME is as in the MzScheme manual (i.e., a standard
;; module spec) and IDS are the un-provided identifiers that you wish to
;; expose in the current module.
;; Based on a macro by Raymond Racine (rr...@ad...) posted to
;; plt-scheme in Dec 2003.
(define-syntax require/expose
(syntax-rules ()
[(_ mod (ids ...))
(begin
(require mod)
(define-values (ids ...)
(let ([ns (module->namespace 'mod)])
(parameterize ([current-namespace ns])
(values
(namespace-variable-value 'ids)...)))))]))
There are some other comments I want to make, but I'll take the
discussion to schematics-development just as soon as I've subscribed.
Richard
|
|
From: Noel W. <noe...@ya...> - 2004-08-02 13:18:47
|
--- King Doug <kin...@si...> wrote: > I would like to see the sub-suite failures propagate all > the way to the top (i.e. > a test-suite fails if any of its tests or sub-suites > fails, and similarly for errors) I agree this would be a good improvement. As part of redeveloping SchemeUnit I hope to fix the GUI and will try to implement this improvement. Cheers, Noel ===== Email: noelwelsh <at> yahoo <dot> com Jabber: noelw <at> jabber <dot> org __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail |
|
From: King D. <kin...@si...> - 2004-07-29 19:22:44
|
When I have a set of tests with sub-suites and one of the sub-suites has a failure
(see code below), the failure isn't reported in the Test Root node. To see these
failures, you have to manually search the tree of tests, and it's easy to miss
a deeply nested test case failure.
I would like to see the sub-suite failures propagate all the way to the top (i.e.
a test-suite fails if any of its tests or sub-suites fails, and similarly for errors)
(define (add a b) (+ a b))
(require (lib "test.ss" "schemeunit")
(lib "drscheme-ui.ss" "schemeunit"))
(define adder-tests
(make-test-suite
"tests for adder.scm"
(make-test-case
"addition"
(assert = 2 (add 1 1)))
(make-test-suite
"recursive suite with failure"
(make-test-case
"recursive failure case"
(assert = 4 (add (add 1 1) 1))))))
(register-test adder-tests)
Doug King
king dot doug at siemens dot com
|
|
From: Noel W. <noe...@ya...> - 2004-07-01 13:18:48
|
I have just released some code for client side cookie management. It provides: - a representation for RFC 2109 and Netscape cookies - functions to parse cookies from HTTP headers - a cookie-jar to manage received cookies - functions to turn cookies into strings suitable for a Cookie HTTP header - miscellaneous other procedures There are some outstanding issues with the package, but it should be good enough for small scale applications. It has been released now, when it still have some problems, to give others access to the code as early as possible. Future releases will fix these problems and add additional functionality. The code is the cookie 0.1 release at Schematics: http://schematics.sourceforge.net/ Enjoy! Noel ===== Email: noelwelsh <at> yahoo <dot> com Jabber: noelw <at> jabber <dot> org __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail |
|
From: Noel W. <noe...@ya...> - 2004-06-24 12:01:30
|
Hi all, I've just released SchemeUnit 2.0 alpha 1 as a sketch of some of the intended functionality for the next version of SchemeUnit. The code is released as a tarball, not a .plt, as I don't recommend installing it in your collections path at this early stage. If you're interested in the future development of SchemeUnit please take a look as this package, in particular the CHANGES and TODO files. I'm open to all suggestions for additional functionality. I'd prefer any discussion takes place on schematics-development. The release is at the usual place on Sourceforge. Noel ===== Email: noelwelsh <at> yahoo <dot> com Jabber: noelw <at> jabber <dot> org __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: <ben...@id...> - 2004-05-25 08:33:58
|
Dear Open Source developer I am doing a research project on "Fun and Software Development" in which I kindly invite you to participate. You will find the online survey under http://fasd.ethz.ch/qsf/. The questionnaire consists of 53 questions and you will need about 15 minutes to complete it. With the FASD project (Fun and Software Development) we want to define the motivational significance of fun when software developers decide to engage in Open Source projects. What is special about our research project is that a similar survey is planned with software developers in commercial firms. This procedure allows the immediate comparison between the involved individuals and the conditions of production of these two development models. Thus we hope to obtain substantial new insights to the phenomenon of Open Source Development. With many thanks for your participation, Benno Luthiger PS: The results of the survey will be published under http://www.isu.unizh.ch/fuehrung/blprojects/FASD/. We have set up the mailing list fa...@we... for this study. Please see http://fasd.ethz.ch/qsf/mailinglist_en.html for registration to this mailing list. _______________________________________________________________________ Benno Luthiger Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich 8092 Zurich Mail: benno.luthiger(at)id.ethz.ch _______________________________________________________________________ |
|
From: Brent F. <bf...@pa...> - 2004-03-10 01:22:35
|
--- Noel Welsh <noe...@ya...> wrote: > http://schematics.sf.net/new/schematics.html > > is a simple design I've knocked up. I've only > looked > at it in IE 5. It probably looks 'orrible in > Mozilla. I like it. It looks pretty good under Firefox, but the lambda is not properly displayed (Sclematics!) Both Firefox (Mozilla) and IE 6.0 show the rendering as only taking up about half the screen (I suppose this is on purpose). I enjoyed the ad copy quite a bit as well! Now, off to writing more verveless software in my 10-hour day... ;-) -Brent |
|
From: Noel W. <noe...@ya...> - 2004-03-09 10:10:35
|
Dear Schematicians, At http://schematics.sf.net/new/schematics.html is a simple design I've knocked up. I've only looked at it in IE 5. It probably looks 'orrible in Mozilla. Please comment, or better yet, design your own replacements for our crumby website. Maybe we can have a little competition to redesign the site. My design is pure HTML + CSS. It would probably be enhanced by a few judicious graphics. I just don't have access to a graphics program at the moment. Regards, Noel ===== Email: noelwelsh <at> yahoo <dot> com Jabber: noelw <at> jabber <dot> org __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com |
|
From: Noel W. <noe...@ya...> - 2004-02-02 18:37:36
|
Get rid of (require (lib "assert.ss" "schemeunit")) So > (require > (lib "test.ss" "schemeunit") > (lib "text-ui.ss" "schemeunit") > "mzgdbm.scm" ;; - this is my module > ) > HTH, Noel ===== Email: noelwelsh <at> yahoo <dot> com Jabber: noelw <at> jabber <dot> org __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/ |
|
From: Alex O. <ot...@je...> - 2004-01-31 02:59:00
|
Hello I just download schemeunit.plt from sf.net and try to use - but i get message from mzscheme mzgdbm-tests.scm:8:2: module: identifier already imported (from a different source) at: fail in: (require (lib "assert.ss" "schemeunit") (lib "test.ss" "schemeunit") (lib "text-ui.ss" "schemeuni... in mzgdbm-tests.scm i have: (require (lib "assert.ss" "schemeunit") (lib "test.ss" "schemeunit") (lib "text-ui.ss" "schemeunit") "mzgdbm.scm" ;; - this is my module ) and my test follow -- With best wishes, Alex Ott Jet Infosystems, http://www.jetinfosoft.ru/ +7 (095) 411 76 01 |
|
From: Noel W. <noe...@ya...> - 2004-01-28 16:31:02
|
--- Chris Gaskett <cga...@at...> wrote: > I get some errors from Schemeunit if I use the gui > interface with the > just released DrScheme 206. *Grumble* It broke when 205 came out as well...here me go again... Noel ===== Email: noelwelsh <at> yahoo <dot> com Jabber: noelw <at> jabber <dot> org __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/ |
2 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
