Systems Biology Graphical Notation / SBGN PD L1 / #137 Subunit as a process

#137 Subunit as a process

Status: pending

Owner: nobody

Labels: SBGN Issues (15)

Priority: 5

Updated: 2011-04-16

Created: 2011-04-14

Creator: Stuart Moodie

Private: No

This came up way back in Stanford. Should a subunit be classified as a type of process. I wasn't a fan at the time - still not, but it kind of makes sense. Also one can include a phenotype as a similar type of non-stiochiometric process. Candiated for inclusion in V2.0.

Discussion

Nicolas Le Novère - 2011-04-16

No. I strongly object to that. This completely breaks the bipartite nature of PD. EPN are continuants, PNs are occurants. And subunits are nothing. Just decorations.

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Nicolas Le Novère - 2011-04-16

status: open --> pending
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Subunit as a process

Group

Searches

Help

#137 Subunit as a process

Discussion