From: Richard P. <pro...@gm...> - 2009-05-23 00:00:08
|
Hi, I'm also having the same "bus error" when I try to run sbcl. However, I'm on a PPC machine. Specs are below. Can anyone point me in the right direction to fix this problem? Using package: sbcl-1.0.22-powerpc-darwin System Version: Mac OS X 10.4.11 (8S165) Kernel Version: Darwin 8.11.0 Machine Name: iBook G4 CPU Type: PowerPC G4 (1.1) (gdb) handle SIGUSR1 pass nostop Signal Stop Print Pass to program Description SIGUSR1 No Yes Yes User defined signal 1 (gdb) run Starting program: /Users/aniak/Documents/temp/sbcl-1.0.22-powerpc-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1. Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. Reason: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE at address: 0x00000000 0x9012cab0 in _malloc_initialize () (gdb) where #0 0x9012cab0 in _malloc_initialize () #1 0x90002fb8 in malloc () #2 0x0000a9bc in successful_malloc () #3 0x0000aa10 in copied_string () #4 0x0000de2c in os_get_runtime_executable_path () #5 0x0000ac18 in main () (gdb) |
From: Thomas de G. <bil...@ma...> - 2010-04-17 11:13:56
|
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Nikodemus Siivola <nikodemus@random- state.net> wrote : > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Nathan Froyd <fr...@gm...> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Nikodemus Siivola <nik...@ra...> wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Nathan Froyd <fr...@gm...> wrote: > > > > > I can confirm that the 1.0.23 binary packages fall over on a 10.4 box. > > > > Does this one work (build on Leopard)? > > > > http://random-state.net/tmp/sbcl-1.0.23.46.tiger-binary.tar.gz > > > > The difference is putting the -mmacosx-version-min=10.4 to LINKFLAGS as well. > > > Yes, that works much better. > > Committed as 1.0.23.47. I have this same problem bootstrapping sbcl on Tiger today from the ppc/darwin binary tarball on sourceforge : http://sourceforge.net/projects/sbcl/files/sbcl/1.0.22/sbcl-1.0.22- powerpc-darwin-binary.tar.bz2 MacPorts rely on this binary release to bootstrap a newer version, and so is broken on Tiger/ppc. It would be really nice to have a Tiger compatible (possibly a more recent version ?) of the ppc/darwin binary available on sourceforge. Regards, -- Thomas de Grivel http://b.lowh.net/billitch |
From: Thomas de G. <bil...@gm...> - 2010-05-09 02:12:40
|
Thomas de Grivel wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Nikodemus Siivola > <nik...@ra...> wrote : > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Nathan Froyd <fr...@gm...> wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Nikodemus Siivola > <nik...@ra...> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Nathan Froyd <fr...@gm...> > wrote: > > > > > > > I can confirm that the 1.0.23 binary packages fall over on a > 10.4 box. > > > > > > Does this one work (build on Leopard)? > > > > > > http://random-state.net/tmp/sbcl-1.0.23.46.tiger-binary.tar.gz > > > > > > The difference is putting the -mmacosx-version-min=10.4 to > LINKFLAGS as well. > > > > > Yes, that works much better. > > > > Committed as 1.0.23.47. > > I have this same problem bootstrapping sbcl on Tiger today from the > ppc/darwin binary tarball on sourceforge : > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/sbcl/files/sbcl/1.0.22/sbcl-1.0.22-powerpc-darwin-binary.tar.bz2 > > > MacPorts rely on this binary release to bootstrap a newer version, and > so is broken on Tiger/ppc. It would be really nice to have a Tiger > compatible (possibly a more recent version ?) of the ppc/darwin binary > available on sourceforge. Has everyone here the inability to produce a powerpc/darwin binary compatible with Tiger ? Negative answers appreciated. =) Regards, -- Thomas de Grivel http://b.lowh.net/billitch |
From: Bruce O'N. <ec...@pc...> - 2010-05-12 07:12:36
|
Hi, I have some 15" Powerbook which is fiddly under the different free OSes, that, if it is useful, I could load up Tiger on to do this build. Would that help? I might be able to do this over the upcoming long weekend, but, no guarantees. cheers bruce ----- Message d'origine ----- De: Thomas de Grivel <bil...@gm...> Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 04:12:29 +0200 Sujet: [Sbcl-devel] sbcl image for Tiger/ppc (was: Bus Error when running SBCL on Mac) À: sbc...@li... Thomas de Grivel wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Nikodemus Siivola > wrote : > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Nikodemus Siivola > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Nathan Froyd > wrote: > > > > > > > I can confirm that the 1.0.23 binary packages fall over on a > 10.4 box. > > > > > > Does this one work (build on Leopard)? > > > > > > http://random-state.net/tmp/sbcl-1.0.23.46.tiger-binary.tar.gz > > > > > > The difference is putting the -mmacosx-version-min=10.4 to > LINKFLAGS as well. > > > > > Yes, that works much better. > > > > Committed as 1.0.23.47. > > I have this same problem bootstrapping sbcl on Tiger today from the > ppc/darwin binary tarball on sourceforge : > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/sbcl/files/sbcl/1.0.22/sbcl-1.0.22-powerpc-darwin-binary.tar.bz2 > > > MacPorts rely on this binary release to bootstrap a newer version, and > so is broken on Tiger/ppc. It would be really nice to have a Tiger > compatible (possibly a more recent version ?) of the ppc/darwin binary > available on sourceforge. Has everyone here the inability to produce a powerpc/darwin binary compatible with Tiger ? Negative answers appreciated. =) Regards, -- Thomas de Grivel http://b.lowh.net/billitch ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Sbcl-devel mailing list Sbc...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel |
From: Thomas de G. <bil...@gm...> - 2010-05-21 11:30:06
|
Bruce O'Neel wrote: > Hi, > > I have some 15" Powerbook which is fiddly under the different free OSes, > that, if it is useful, I could load up Tiger on to do this build. Would > that help? > > I might be able to do this over the upcoming long weekend, but, no > guarantees. Actually if you read the original messages you don't actually need Tiger to build working PPC images, one just has to add proper flags when building the PPC image. On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote: > The difference is putting the -mmacosx-version-min=10.4 to LINKFLAGS as well. If you could upload such an image to sourceforge it would be possible to distribute sbcl in macports for ppc/tiger as well. > ----- Message d'origine ----- > *De:* Thomas de Grivel <bil...@gm...> > *Date:* Sun, 09 May 2010 04:12:29 +0200 > *Sujet:* [Sbcl-devel] sbcl image for Tiger/ppc (was: Bus Error when > running SBCL on Mac) > *À:* sbc...@li... > > Thomas de Grivel wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Nikodemus Siivola > > wrote : > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Nikodemus Siivola > > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Nathan Froyd > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I can confirm that the 1.0.23 binary packages fall over on a > > 10.4 box. > > > > > > > > Does this one work (build on Leopard)? > > > > > > > > http://random-state.net/tmp/sbcl-1.0.23.46.tiger-binary.tar.gz > > > > > > > > The difference is putting the -mmacosx-version-min=10.4 to > > LINKFLAGS as well. > > > > > > > Yes, that works much better. > > > > > > Committed as 1.0.23.47. > > > > I have this same problem bootstrapping sbcl ! on Tiger today from the > > ppc/darwin binary tarball on sourceforge : > > > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/sbcl/files/sbcl/1.0.22/sbcl-1.0.22-powerpc-darwin-binary.tar.bz2 > > > > > > > MacPorts rely on this binary release to bootstrap a newer version, and > > so is broken on Tiger/ppc. It would be really nice to have a Tiger > > compatible (possibly a more recent version ?) of the ppc/darwin binary > > available on sourceforge. > > Has everyone here the inability to produce a powerpc/darwin binary > compatible with Tiger ? Negative answers appreciated. =) Cheers ! -- Thomas de Grivel http://b.lowh.net/billitch |
From: Bruce O'N. <ec...@pc...> - 2010-05-22 12:17:22
|
Hi, Well, it turns out that the easiest for me was to load the powerbook with the apple install disks, including the copy of Xcode which shipped with this vintage powerbook. So, there is now a built sbcl version of 1.0.38.9 for tiger at: http://www.pckswarms.ch/sbcl/sbcl-1.0.38.9-ppc-darwin-tiger.tar.gz It's not possible for me to upload this to sourceforge. It self hosts, but, I didn't run the tests. I'll play a bit more over time. cheers bruce On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 01:29:57PM +0200, Thomas de Grivel wrote: > Bruce O'Neel wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I have some 15" Powerbook which is fiddly under the different free > >OSes, that, if it is useful, I could load up Tiger on to do this > >build. Would that help? > > > >I might be able to do this over the upcoming long weekend, but, no > >guarantees. > > Actually if you read the original messages you don't actually need > Tiger to build working PPC images, one just has to add proper flags > when building the PPC image. > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote: > > The difference is putting the -mmacosx-version-min=10.4 to > LINKFLAGS as well. > > If you could upload such an image to sourceforge it would be > possible to distribute sbcl in macports for ppc/tiger as well. > > > >----- Message d'origine ----- > >*De:* Thomas de Grivel <bil...@gm...> > >*Date:* Sun, 09 May 2010 04:12:29 +0200 > >*Sujet:* [Sbcl-devel] sbcl image for Tiger/ppc (was: Bus Error > >when running SBCL on Mac) > >*?:* sbc...@li... > > > >Thomas de Grivel wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Nikodemus Siivola > > > wrote : > > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Nikodemus Siivola > > > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Nathan Froyd > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I can confirm that the 1.0.23 binary packages fall over on a > > > 10.4 box. > > > > > > > > > > Does this one work (build on Leopard)? > > > > > > > > > > http://random-state.net/tmp/sbcl-1.0.23.46.tiger-binary.tar.gz > > > > > > > > > > The difference is putting the -mmacosx-version-min=10.4 to > > > LINKFLAGS as well. > > > > > > > > > Yes, that works much better. > > > > > > > > Committed as 1.0.23.47. > > > > > > I have this same problem bootstrapping sbcl ! on Tiger today from the > > > ppc/darwin binary tarball on sourceforge : > > > > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/sbcl/files/sbcl/1.0.22/sbcl-1.0.22-powerpc-darwin-binary.tar.bz2 > > > > > > > > > > > MacPorts rely on this binary release to bootstrap a newer version, and > > > so is broken on Tiger/ppc. It would be really nice to have a Tiger > > > compatible (possibly a more recent version ?) of the ppc/darwin binary > > > available on sourceforge. > > > >Has everyone here the inability to produce a powerpc/darwin binary > >compatible with Tiger ? Negative answers appreciated. =) > > Cheers ! > > -- > Thomas de Grivel > http://b.lowh.net/billitch |
From: Gábor M. <me...@re...> - 2009-05-25 09:24:48
|
On Sábado 23 Mayo 2009, Richard Project wrote: > Hi, > I'm also having the same "bus error" when I try to run sbcl. However, > I'm on a PPC machine. Specs are below. Can anyone point me in the > right direction to fix this problem? > > Using package: sbcl-1.0.22-powerpc-darwin > System Version: Mac OS X 10.4.11 (8S165) > Kernel Version: Darwin 8.11.0 > Machine Name: iBook G4 > CPU Type: PowerPC G4 (1.1) > > (gdb) handle SIGUSR1 pass nostop > Signal Stop Print Pass to program Description > SIGUSR1 No Yes Yes User defined signal 1 > (gdb) run > Starting program: > /Users/aniak/Documents/temp/sbcl-1.0.22-powerpc-darwin/src/runtime/sb >cl > > Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1. > > Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. > Reason: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE at address: 0x00000000 > 0x9012cab0 in _malloc_initialize () > (gdb) where > #0 0x9012cab0 in _malloc_initialize () > #1 0x90002fb8 in malloc () > #2 0x0000a9bc in successful_malloc () > #3 0x0000aa10 in copied_string () > #4 0x0000de2c in os_get_runtime_executable_path () > #5 0x0000ac18 in main () > (gdb) In all likelihood, the relevant fix is in 1.0.24. Cheers, Gabor |
From: Richard P. <pro...@gm...> - 2009-06-03 14:17:45
|
Re-Post: Sorry, Forgot to CC the mailing list. Greetings, Over the weekend I downloaded: sbcl-1.0.28-source.tar.bz2 and built it using the compiler from: sbcl-1.0-ppc-darwin-binary.tar.bz2 (The binaries from 1.0-ppc-darwin installs and runs OK) and gcc 4.0.0. It built to completion but the following warning was printed at the end: WARNING! Some of the contrib modules did not build successfully or pass their self-tests. Failed contribs:" sb-bsd-sockets sb-introspect sb-md5 sb-simple-streams Because I am not sure how those warning will affect the compiled binaries (1.0.28) I will stick to version 1.0-ppc for now since it seems to be running perfectly. Should I ignore the above warnings? Do they apply to Mac OS X environments? Below is a snippet from the last portion of the compilation showing 2 fatal errors: ; /Users/aniak/Documents/temp/sbcl-1.0.28/contrib/sb-posix/defpackage.fasl written ; compilation finished in 0:00:00.035 WARNING: COMPILE-FILE warned while performing #<COMPILE-OP NIL {11C77939}> on #<CL-SOURCE-FILE "defpackage" {11EC1251}>. unhandled ASDF:COMPILE-FAILED: erred while invoking #<COMPILE-OP NIL {11C77939}> on #<CL-SOURCE-FILE "defpackage" {11EC1251}> 0: (SB-DEBUG::MAP-BACKTRACE #<CLOSURE (LAMBDA #) {1271F1E5}>)[:EXTERNAL] 1: (BACKTRACE 128 #<SYNONYM-STREAM :SYMBOL SB-SYS:*STDERR* {100E8651}>) 2: (SB-DEBUG::DEBUGGER-DISABLED-HOOK #<ASDF:COMPILE-FAILED {1271B389}> #<unavailable argument>) 3: (INVOKE-DEBUGGER #<ASDF:COMPILE-FAILED {1271B389}>) 4: (ERROR ASDF:COMPILE-FAILED)[:EXTERNAL] 5: ((SB-PCL::FAST-METHOD ASDF:PERFORM (ASDF:COMPILE-OP ASDF:CL-SOURCE-FILE)) #<unavailable argument> #<unavailable argument> #<ASDF:COMPILE-OP NIL {11C77939}> #<ASDF:CL-SOURCE-FILE "defpackage" {11EC1251}>) 6: ((LAMBDA (SB-PCL::.PV. SB-PCL::.NEXT-METHOD-CALL. SB-PCL::.ARG0. SB-PCL::.ARG1.)) #<unavailable argument> #<unavailable argument> #<ASDF:COMPILE-OP NIL {11C77939}> #<ASDF:CL-SOURCE-FILE "defpackage" {11EC1251}>) 7: ((SB-PCL::FAST-METHOD ASDF:PERFORM ASDF:AROUND (ASDF:COMPILE-OP ASDF:CL-SOURCE-FILE)) #<unavailable argument> #S(SB-PCL::FAST-METHOD-CALL :FUNCTION #<CLOSURE # {126F23F5}> :PV NIL :NEXT-METHOD-CALL NIL :ARG-INFO (2)) #<ASDF:COMPILE-OP NIL {11C77939}> #<ASDF:CL-SOURCE-FILE "defpackage" {11EC1251}>) 8: ((LAMBDA ())) 9: (SB-C::%WITH-COMPILATION-UNIT #<CLOSURE (LAMBDA #) {11BFA2BD}>)[:EXTERNAL] 10: (ASDF:OPERATE ASDF:LOAD-OP SB-SIMPLE-STREAM-SYSTEM::SB-SIMPLE-STREAMS-TESTS)[:EXTERNAL] 11: ((SB-PCL::FAST-METHOD ASDF:PERFORM (ASDF:TEST-OP (EQL (ASDF:FIND-SYSTEM :SB-SIMPLE-STREAMS)))) #<unavailable argument> #<unavailable argument> #<unavailable argument> #<unavailable argument>) 12: ((LAMBDA (SB-PCL::.PV. SB-PCL::.NEXT-METHOD-CALL. SB-PCL::.ARG0. SB-PCL::.ARG1.)) #<unavailable argument> #<unavailable argument> #<ASDF:TEST-OP NIL {11BFA0B9}> #<ASDF:SYSTEM "sb-simple-streams" {11D289E9}>) 13: ((LAMBDA ())) 14: ((FLET SB-THREAD::WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK-THUNK)) 15: (SB-C::%WITH-COMPILATION-UNIT #<CLOSURE (LAMBDA #) {11BFA0DD}>)[:EXTERNAL] 16: (ASDF:OPERATE ASDF:TEST-OP :SB-SIMPLE-STREAMS)[:EXTERNAL] 17: (SB-INT:SIMPLE-EVAL-IN-LEXENV (ASDF:OPERATE 'ASDF:TEST-OP :SB-SIMPLE-STREAMS) #<NULL-LEXENV>) 18: (INTERACTIVE-EVAL (ASDF:OPERATE 'ASDF:TEST-OP :SB-SIMPLE-STREAMS))[:EXTERNAL] 19: (SB-IMPL::REPL-FUN NIL) 20: ((LAMBDA ())) 21: (SB-IMPL::%WITH-REBOUND-IO-SYNTAX #<CLOSURE (LAMBDA #) {11D288F5}>) 22: (SB-IMPL::TOPLEVEL-REPL NIL) 23: (SB-IMPL::TOPLEVEL-INIT) 24: ((LABELS SB-IMPL::RESTART-LISP)) unhandled condition in --disable-debugger mode, quitting ; ; compilation unit aborted ; caught 2 fatal ERROR conditions ; caught 1 WARNING condition make: *** [test] Error 1 /Users/aniak/Documents/temp/sbcl-1.0.28/src/runtime/sbcl --noinform --core /Users/aniak/Documents/temp/sbcl-1.0.28/output/sbcl.core --lose-on-corruption --disable-debugger --no-sysinit --no-userinit --eval '(compile-file (format nil "SYS:CONTRIB;~:@(~A~);~:@(~A~).LISP" "sb-sprof" "sb-sprof"))' </dev/null ; compiling file "/Users/aniak/Documents/temp/sbcl-1.0.28/contrib/sb-sprof/sb-sprof.lisp" (written 24 MAY 2009 04:49:05 PM): ; compiling (DEFPACKAGE #:SB-SPROF ...) ; compiling (IN-PACKAGE #:SB-SPROF) ; compiling (DEFSTRUCT (VERTEX # ...) ...) ; compiling (DEFSTRUCT EDGE ...) ; compiling (DEFSTRUCT GRAPH ...) ; compiling (DECLAIM (INLINE SCC-P)) ; compiling (DEFUN SCC-P ...) ; compiling (DEFMACRO DO-VERTICES ...) ; compiling (DEFMACRO DO-EDGES ...) ; compiling (DEFUN SELF-CYCLE-P ...) ; compiling (DEFUN MAP-VERTICES ...) ; compiling (DEFUN STRONG-COMPONENTS ...) ; compiling (DEFUN TOPOLOGICAL-SORT ...) ; compiling (DEFUN REDUCE-GRAPH ...) ; compiling (DEFTYPE ADDRESS ...) ; compiling (DEFCONSTANT +UNKNOWN-ADDRESS+ ...) ; compiling (DEFSTRUCT (CALL-GRAPH # ...) ...) ; compiling (DEFSTRUCT (NODE # ...) ...) ; compiling (DEFSTRUCT (CYCLE #)) ; compiling (DEFSTRUCT (CALL # ...) ...) ... some parts removed .... ; compiling (DEFUN REPORT ...) ; compiling (DEFUN SAMPLE-PC-FROM-PC-OR-OFFSET ...) ; compiling (DEFUN ADD-DISASSEMBLY-PROFILE-NOTE ...) ; compiling (PUSHNEW (QUOTE ADD-DISASSEMBLY-PROFILE-NOTE) ...) ; compiling (DEFUN PROFILE-CALL-COUNTS ...) ; compiling (DEFUN PROFILE-CALL-COUNTS-FOR-FUNCTION ...) ; compiling (DEFUN UNPROFILE-CALL-COUNTS ...) ; compiling (DEFUN ENABLE-CALL-COUNTING ...) ; compiling (DEFUN DISABLE-CALL-COUNTING ...) ; compiling (DEFUN ENABLE-CALL-COUNTING-FOR-FUNCTION ...) ; file: /Users/aniak/Documents/temp/sbcl-1.0.28/contrib/sb-sprof/sb-sprof.lisp ; in: DEFUN ENABLE-CALL-COUNTING-FOR-FUNCTION ; (INCF (THE (UNSIGNED-BYTE 59) (CAR SB-SPROF::INFO))) ; --> LET* ; ==> ; (+ (THE (UNSIGNED-BYTE 59) (CAR #:TMP3183)) #:G3184) ; ; note: forced to do GENERIC-+ (cost 10) ; unable to do inline fixnum arithmetic (cost 1) because: ; The first argument is a (UNSIGNED-BYTE 59), not a FIXNUM. ; The result is a (VALUES (INTEGER 1 576460752303423487) &OPTIONAL), not a (VALUES ; FIXNUM ; &REST ; T). ; unable to do inline fixnum arithmetic (cost 2) because: ; The first argument is a (UNSIGNED-BYTE 59), not a FIXNUM. ; The result is a (VALUES (INTEGER 1 576460752303423487) &OPTIONAL), not a (VALUES ; FIXNUM ; &REST ; T). ; etc. ; compiling (DEFUN TEST-0 ...) ; compiling (DEFUN TEST ...) ; compiling (PROVIDE (QUOTE SB-SPROF)) ; file: /Users/aniak/Documents/temp/sbcl-1.0.28/contrib/sb-sprof/sb-sprof.lisp ; in: DEFUN START-PROFILING ; #'SB-SPROF::THREAD-DISTRIBUTION-HANDLER ; ; caught STYLE-WARNING: ; undefined function: THREAD-DISTRIBUTION-HANDLER ; ; caught STYLE-WARNING: ; This function is undefined: ; THREAD-DISTRIBUTION-HANDLER ; ; compilation unit finished ; caught 2 STYLE-WARNING conditions ; printed 1 note ; SYS:CONTRIB;SB-SPROF;SB-SPROF.FASL.NEWEST written ; compilation finished in 0:00:08.884 * true WARNING! Some of the contrib modules did not build successfully or pass their self-tests. Failed contribs:" sb-bsd-sockets sb-introspect sb-md5 sb-simple-streams --- end --- 2009/5/25 Gábor Melis <me...@re...>: > On Sábado 23 Mayo 2009, Richard Project wrote: >> Hi, >> I'm also having the same "bus error" when I try to run sbcl. However, >> I'm on a PPC machine. Specs are below. Can anyone point me in the >> right direction to fix this problem? >> >> Using package: sbcl-1.0.22-powerpc-darwin >> System Version: Mac OS X 10.4.11 (8S165) >> Kernel Version: Darwin 8.11.0 >> Machine Name: iBook G4 >> CPU Type: PowerPC G4 (1.1) >> >> (gdb) handle SIGUSR1 pass nostop >> Signal Stop Print Pass to program Description >> SIGUSR1 No Yes Yes User defined signal 1 >> (gdb) run >> Starting program: >> /Users/aniak/Documents/temp/sbcl-1.0.22-powerpc-darwin/src/runtime/sb >>cl >> >> Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1. >> >> Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. >> Reason: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE at address: 0x00000000 >> 0x9012cab0 in _malloc_initialize () >> (gdb) where >> #0 0x9012cab0 in _malloc_initialize () >> #1 0x90002fb8 in malloc () >> #2 0x0000a9bc in successful_malloc () >> #3 0x0000aa10 in copied_string () >> #4 0x0000de2c in os_get_runtime_executable_path () >> #5 0x0000ac18 in main () >> (gdb) > > In all likelihood, the relevant fix is in 1.0.24. > > Cheers, Gabor > |
From: Nikodemus S. <nik...@ra...> - 2009-06-03 17:48:12
|
2009/6/3 Richard Project <pro...@gm...>: > Over the weekend I downloaded: sbcl-1.0.28-source.tar.bz2 and built it > using the compiler from: sbcl-1.0-ppc-darwin-binary.tar.bz2 (The > binaries from 1.0-ppc-darwin installs and runs OK) and gcc 4.0.0. > > It built to completion but the following warning was printed at the end: > > WARNING! Some of the contrib modules did not build successfully or pass > their self-tests. Failed contribs:" > sb-bsd-sockets > sb-introspect > sb-md5 > sb-simple-streams > > Because I am not sure how those warning will affect the compiled > binaries (1.0.28) I will stick to version 1.0-ppc for now since it > seems to be running perfectly. I cannot replicate this on my Panther box, unfortunately. It would be a great help if you could do sh make-target-contribs.sh &> contrib.log and send the contrib.log to the list -- though you'll want to gzip or zip it first. (The interesting bits are not in the section of the output you sent.) > Should I ignore the above warnings? Do they apply to Mac OS X environments? They do apply, and are not expected. Typically build failures such as yours are environment issues -- but we'll see. Thanks for reporting this. Cheers, -- Nikodemus |
From: Richard P. <pro...@gm...> - 2009-06-04 08:07:10
|
Thanks Nikodemus, Based off your suggestion I did a clean install of my Mac OS X and did a rebuild of SBCL. This time there were no fail messages at the end of build (15 out of 15 were successful). I think a macport update that I did may have messed up my development environment before the first build. I made a log of "run-tests.sh" for my system. System Version: Mac OS X 10.4.11 (8S165) Kernel Version: Darwin 8.11.0 CPU Type: PowerPC G4 (1.1) 1.25 GB RAM Finished running tests. Status: Expected failure: float.pure.lisp / (SCALE-FLOAT-OVERFLOW BUG-372) Expected failure: float.pure.lisp / (ADDITION-OVERFLOW BUG-372) Expected failure: debug.impure.lisp / (UNDEFINED-FUNCTION BUG-346) Failure: debug.impure.lisp / (UNDEFINED-FUNCTION BUG-353) Unhandled error dynamic-extent.impure.lisp Expected failure: external-format.impure.lisp / (CHARACTER-DECODE-LARGE FORCE-END-OF-FILE) Expected failure: packages.impure.lisp / USE-PACKAGE-CONFLICT-SET Expected failure: packages.impure.lisp / IMPORT-SINGLE-CONFLICT Failure: timer.impure.lisp / (TIMER STRESS) Failure: timer.impure.lisp / (WITH-TIMEOUT TIMEOUT) test failed, expected 104 return code, got 1 If any of this interest you, let me know and I can email you the zipped log. All and all, everything seems to be running perfectly (sbcl-1.0.28). Thanks again. -Rich > > I cannot replicate this on my Panther box, unfortunately. It would be > a great help if you could do > > sh make-target-contribs.sh &> contrib.log > > > They do apply, and are not expected. Typically build failures such as > yours are environment issues -- but we'll see. Thanks for reporting > this. > > Cheers, > > -- Nikodemus > |