From: Thomas de G. <bil...@gm...> - 2010-05-09 02:12:40
|
Thomas de Grivel wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Nikodemus Siivola > <nik...@ra...> wrote : > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Nathan Froyd <fr...@gm...> wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Nikodemus Siivola > <nik...@ra...> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Nathan Froyd <fr...@gm...> > wrote: > > > > > > > I can confirm that the 1.0.23 binary packages fall over on a > 10.4 box. > > > > > > Does this one work (build on Leopard)? > > > > > > http://random-state.net/tmp/sbcl-1.0.23.46.tiger-binary.tar.gz > > > > > > The difference is putting the -mmacosx-version-min=10.4 to > LINKFLAGS as well. > > > > > Yes, that works much better. > > > > Committed as 1.0.23.47. > > I have this same problem bootstrapping sbcl on Tiger today from the > ppc/darwin binary tarball on sourceforge : > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/sbcl/files/sbcl/1.0.22/sbcl-1.0.22-powerpc-darwin-binary.tar.bz2 > > > MacPorts rely on this binary release to bootstrap a newer version, and > so is broken on Tiger/ppc. It would be really nice to have a Tiger > compatible (possibly a more recent version ?) of the ppc/darwin binary > available on sourceforge. Has everyone here the inability to produce a powerpc/darwin binary compatible with Tiger ? Negative answers appreciated. =) Regards, -- Thomas de Grivel http://b.lowh.net/billitch |