Re: [Sbcl-help] &OPTIONAL and &KEY found in the same lambda list

[Lars B. <la...@no...>]

Christophe Rhodes <cs...@ca...> writes:
> If you are worried about style-warning being too coarse a class to
> muffle, then thoughts on a sensible hierarchy of style-warning
> conditions that can be documented and exported from an extension
> package are appreciated.

I'm sorry, but I don't have any suggestions.  In almost every case, it
would be better to code around this particular style warning, so I
couldn't justify putting it in any particular place in such a hierarchy.