Re: [Sbcl-help] Re: build contrib packages failed to build on x86/darwin -- solved

[Cyrus H. <ch...@bo...>]

It's also quite possible that this is part of the inherent flakiness  
of the x86/darwin part at this point. I saw some sporadic contrib  
failures, before I became obsessed with the underlying cause of the  
x86/darwin instability.

As for the binary, I'm reluctant to let this out into the wild to  
folks who aren't brave enough to do their own cross-compile until I  
resolve the x86/darwin issue. Stop by #lisp for details if you're  
interested. I'll try to write something about it in the next day or  
so if I don't have a positive resolution, which looks tantalizingly  
close yet increasingly unlikely.

Cyrus

On Mar 13, 2006, at 9:19 PM, Nikodemus Siivola wrote:

> "Li Lin" <gur...@gm...> writes:
>
>> I finally did a rebuild the whole sbcl package using make.sh on my
>> intel Mac using the sbcl  excutable and core image geneated by cross
>> compiling.
>
> Uh oh.
>
> While it is certainly good to hear that yo got hings working, this  
> sounds
> like we're leaking something from host to target in the build.
>
> Cheers,
>
>   -- Nikodemus              Schemer: "Buddha is small, clean, and  
> serious."
>                    Lispnik: "Buddha is big, has hairy armpits, and  
> laughs."
> .
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting  
> language
> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the  
> live webcast
> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding  
> territory!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? 
> cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Sbcl-help mailing list
> Sbc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-help