Re: [Sbcl-devel] freeze for sbcl-2.6.5

[Stas B. <sta...@gm...>]

There's more breakage from removed symbols.
Some code (slime) grabbed sb-c::tl-xep, some code used
SB-IMPL::MAKE-EVAL-LAMBDA.
Some referenced SB-PCL::CHECK-APPLICABLE-KEYWORDS.
Neither of these uses is defensible, but they should be updated
(naturally, slime already is).

On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 11:52 AM Christophe Rhodes via Sbcl-devel
<sbc...@li...> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Let's press pause on all the exciting changes for now, while we gear up
> for sbcl-2.6.5, probably in the latter half of next week.  Testing would
> be much appreciated, particularly of Real World Code, because although
> we are completely within our rights to change the implementation of
> INTERSECTION and UNION, history (and a current system which rhymes a bit
> with Boogle Plights) suggests that it's possible to end up embedding
> dependencies on the order of elements in the return values of those
> notional set functions.  Reports and bug fixes to other software that
> embeds those assumptions, as well as to SBCL itself, are even more
> welcome in the next week than they would be in general.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Christophe
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sbcl-devel mailing list
> Sbc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel