Re: [Sbcl-devel] fasl suffix change ?

[Rudolf S. <rsc...@is...>]

kr...@mo... writes:

[sbcl-cmucl file extension clash ...]

> if sbcl could use a different suffix by default, it would simplify
> keeping the compiled files separated and non-interfering.  a possible,
> reasonable suffix might be ".sbx86f"

I have thought about this also, but this could become less of an issue
with Peter Van Eynde's Common lisp controller, where every implementation
transparently gets its own object code directory.

But if the extension is changed, I would vote for plain old .fasl, for
purely aesthetic reasons.  :)

Regards,  Rudi