Re: [Sbcl-devel] More host's gensyms

[Manuel G. <ma...@le...>]

Douglas Katzman <do...@go...> writes:

>> Maybe those "sb-xc:gensym" are starting to be too invasive and we should
>> have them "shadowed" instead.
>>
> That seems like a good idea.  Want to prepare a patch which removes the
> explicit sb-xc: and adds to *shadows* in set-up-cold-packages ?

Yes, I could try this. But if you (or Charles) have examples of this
feel free to send them to me.
-- 
Manuel Giraud