Re: [Sbcl-devel] Simplify build id generation

[Spenser T. <spe...@gm...>]

Hello, I went ahead and generated the patch from his pull request on the
github mirror.

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 1:38 PM, Spenser Truex <
spe...@gm...> wrote:

> Hello, I went ahead and generated a patch from his pull request on the
> mirror.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 1:34 PM, Stas Boukarev <sta...@gm...> wrote:
>
>> I'd add the git hash, when available.
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:17 PM Douglas Katzman via Sbcl-devel <
>> sbc...@li...> wrote:
>>
>>> I agree with you; in fact in my build I locally patch it to just
>>> year-month-day.
>>>
>>> As a developer, it's nothing but a hindrance to discover that a core
>>> file that you know should work but was generated on a different machine 1
>>> minute ago in the cloud doesn't start. I often found myself patching out
>>> the build_id check in 'coreparse' entirely, but I was able to get by using
>>> Y-M-D because the build farm finishes on the same day. I just have to make
>>> sure not to integrate from upstream tree more than once a day, or I risk
>>> actual mismatch.
>>>
>>> Anyone else care enough to weigh in on this issue?
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ------------------
>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot______
>>> _________________________________________
>>> Sbcl-devel mailing list
>>> Sbc...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sbcl-devel mailing list
>> Sbc...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel
>>
>>
>