Re: [Sbcl-help] not inlined because not saved?

[Stas B. <sta...@gm...>]

Well, it's a recursive function, it'll want to inline itself again.

On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Will Senn <wil...@gm...> wrote:

> OK. I see the first two points, but why is inlining not good?
>
> On 3/19/17 12:03 PM, Stas Boukarev wrote:
>
> Well, the warning actually gives you directions for inlining.
> And it doesn't complain after recompiling because it complains only once.
> And inlining a recursive function will end badly.
>
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Will Senn <wil...@gm...> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> How do I save a function so that it doesn't generate a warning about the
>> function not being inlined because it hasn't been saved?
>>
>> on first entering SBCL:
>>
>> (defun sum (n1 n2)
>>   (declare (inline sum))
>>   (declare (optimize (debug 3)))
>>   (if (zerop n1) n2
>>       (sum (1- n1) (1+ n2))))
>>
>> ;
>> ; caught STYLE-WARNING:
>> ;   Call to COMMON-LISP-USER::SUM could not be inlined because its
>> source code was
>> ;   not saved. A global INLINE or SB-EXT:MAYBE-INLINE proclamation must
>> be in
>> ;   effect to save function definitions for inlining.
>> ;
>> ; compilation unit finished
>> ;   caught 1 STYLE-WARNING condition
>>
>> SUM
>>
>> on redefinition of sum, it doens't complain about not being about
>> inlining, why?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Will
>>
>> --
>> GPG Fingerprint: 208A 38D6 D1BF 5A6B 7F4D  CC0D 21CB 91B3 21E5 671F
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sbcl-help mailing list
>> Sbc...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-help
>>
>
>
>
> --
> With best regards, Stas.
>
>
> --
> GPG Fingerprint: 208A 38D6 D1BF 5A6B 7F4D  CC0D 21CB 91B3 21E5 671F
>
>


-- 
With best regards, Stas.