From: Stas B. <sta...@gm...> - 2014-06-13 22:58:59
|
Douglas Katzman <do...@go...> writes: > But LIST's explanation uses the word "constructed" (twice) which couldn't > be understood in any way other than creation of new objects. This is getting too silly. "It says constructed, but it doesn't say when, it could have been done earlier or reused." -- With best regards, Stas. |