Re: [Sbcl-devel] Un-applied patches

[Douglas K. <do...@go...>]

TYPE-OF is sometimes going to be less aesthetic than you'd like.
e.g. (TYPE-OF (ASH 1 70)) => (INTEGER 4611686018427387904)
instead of INTEGER or BIGNUM

Also may I suggest eliminating the parenthetical remark in the message and
just say:
"The value FOO is of type X but should be of type Y"



On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Krzysztof Drewniak <
krz...@gm...> wrote:

> During February's code freeze, I submitted some patches to SBCL. The
> first is an improvement to the reporting of type-errors, which can be
> found at https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/777346 . The second patch,
> which generated some controversy, fixed a bug in the handling of Unicode
> digits. Code for handling these digits was already present, but not
> being reached most of the time because of a bug. The patch is at
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/1177986 . Are there any more
> obstacles to applying these patches?
>
> kad
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Sbcl-devel mailing list
> Sbc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel
>