From: Christophe R. <cs...@ca...> - 2013-09-18 11:23:37
|
Christophe Rhodes <cs...@ca...> writes: > Douglas Katzman <do...@go...> writes: > >> 2. Avoid nesting of the macros - it's not very clear. > > Indeed. How did you find this case? Ah, reading your previous messages more carefully I find that CCL complains when deducing that some clauses are unmatchable in TYPECASEs. Personally, I think that an error or even full WARNING under those circumstances is highly dubious, but it's only about 20 years since the concept of STYLE-WARNINGs (for code which is "conforming but nevertheless considered to be faulty or substandard") was introduced. However, we live in the real world, so probably we have to adapt our conditionals to avoid unmatchable clauses in cross-compiled TYPECASEs. I'll try to schedule investigating the CCL build "soon". Cheers, Christophe |